Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
I am surprised to hear they used pots instead of encoders or hall sensors..
|
Price. Economy. Halls only for stick x and y (FFB

)...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
Leo does some filtering on the analog inputs so even if you had a 'spike' it would be filtered out..
|
He does? Didn't know. Didn't see - yet...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
Why Logi can't do the same in their firmware is beyond me in that it is 'standard' practice to do so with most analog inputs to A2Ds..
|
Those spikes are way too big - and just imagine: We would not notice them until the cable really brakes - after warranty has expired...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
Not sure what or why they would impliment in firmware a reversal when using pots.. makes no since really.. Thus I would leave that in the rumor column.. More likly is it is a typical pot spike that spikes in voltage in a direction oposite of what your currently at and thus apears to be a reversal of sort
|
Maybe... When I fix R1 and R2 I could test a high quality poti on the logitech controller... and report here
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES
Yeah you cant go wrong with Leo's stuff.. everyone uses his stuff.. Ill have to look but I seem to recal him having a board that would convert the hall sensor outputs to analog inputs on his board.. if so I would dump all the Logi electronics and go full Leo!
|
Just went to his website: All but his main page report 404. Obviously he's reconstructing... IIRC *all* his board BU0836, A , and X support the A1302KUA-T Hall sensors directly. I've just ordered some. We'll see.
Artist