Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:30 PM
Hogey Hogey is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Settings and theaters

CoD (at the moment) :
1 ) Westfront 1940

IL-2 1946 (v4.09m with mods):
1 ) Westfront 1940 - 45
2 ) Eastfront 1941 - 45
3 ) NorthAfrican Front 1940 - 43
4 ) Italian Front 1940 - 45
5 ) SWPacific Front 1941 -45
6 ) China 1939 - 45
7 ) Spanish Civil War 1936 - 39
8 ) Korean War 1950 - 53
9 ) What if 1945 - 49

So IL-1946 will be without rival for the time being, and when the constant release delays (for the following add-ons of CoD) continue will be there for a long, long time!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:44 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

for a german bomberpilot there could be no better scenario than the the CoD release one......... no canons for the enemy fighters


anyway, i doubt , at least from official releases, there will be ever again such a huge scenariobase as with IL2 MODs.
the fronts will be there, most propably, but only the planes for a short time scenario or even specific battle i expect to be released as further AdOns.
the needed work to make planes and maps for the new standard is so huge.........

time will tell
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-17-2011, 01:46 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

Looks like a plan to me!

Now if it would just work out that way.

Nope, can't do that... too easy.

Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-17-2011, 02:04 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

my "dream" plan would be:
after the CoD release a smaller pay-adon for the same map (to have this work already done ), or with only small modifications with a Dieppe 1942 scenario.
planes like
Hurricane Mk.IIc
Spitfire Mk.Vb
Spitfire F.Mk.IXc
Typhoon Mk.Ib
Whirlwind Mk.I
Mustang Mk.I
Boston Mk.III
B-17E

Bf109G-1
Fw190A-3
Do217E

would be possible

than a huge one with a new map, a Cyreneika map, scenario Tobruk 42 (i would like 41, butthan there would be no Spit ).
planes,
Bf109F-4/Trop
Bf109F-4/B/Trop
Ju88A-4
Ju87D-1
Mc202_VII
SM79

Hurricane Mk.IIc Vokes
Hurricane Mk.IId Vokes
Spitfire Mk.Vc Abukir
Kittyhawk Mk.III
P-40F
Boston Mk.III
Baltimore Mk.III
as examples.
even RN carrieroperations could be added here.
i prefer a Cyreinka over a Malta scenario because Malto lacks the close support air-to-ground action....


than Easternfront, my personal favorite would be the Battle of Kursk 1943.
almost all planes that make fun in air-to-air (109G,190A,Yak9,La5,P-39) and air-to-ground (bombers, IL2, Hs129, Bf110,Fw190F)could be moddeld
This "possible" Battel of Moskau (operation Taifun) winter 41/42 would be just earlier planes, but also not few to choose from..............

THAN in the far east, but what scenario.........not easy.
perhaps a Solomons 42 map. shore based and carrier action........ (hence the Grumman "proplem" ?!)
August 1942 and later
A6M2-N
A6M2 Model 21
A6M3 Model 32
Ki-43-Ic 18. December 42 Rabaul, 11th Sentai
D3A1
B5N2
G4M1

F4F-4
P-400 (from 22. august,67th FS)
SBD-3
TBF-1
P-40F 12.November 42, 68th FS/ 347th FG
P-38F November 42, 339th FS
B-17F

Carriers:
Shokaku
light carrier Ryujo
Saratoga
Enterprise

Carrier Battles:
East Solomons 24. august 42
Santa Cruz 26.Oktober 42




all just personal 'dreams' .... and i am speaking of some years of developmtnet here

Last edited by JG53Frankyboy; 01-17-2011 at 02:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-17-2011, 07:09 PM
hiro hiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 352
Default

I'll go with the BOB SOW / COD, because Il-2 only runs on my dual and single core XP 32 bit machines.

The single's motherboard is acting wonky, as the sound, video, and one PCI slot died in sequence. The battery for the timer clock is gone too. The PSU is showing its age. The 32 bit dual core machine is loaner and since my friend goes through PC like a fish in the water, I can't rely on using it for IL-2.

I have tried to get it to run on Win 7 64 bit duals and quads at work (and my 64 quad at home), but no dice. With lots of time, I know I can probably jury rig something and get it working but I don't have that.






sounds like a plane, er plan!


Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
my "dream" plan would be:
after the CoD release a smaller pay-adon for the same map (to have this work already done ), or with only small modifications with a Dieppe 1942 scenario.
planes like
Hurricane Mk.IIc
Spitfire Mk.Vb
Spitfire F.Mk.IXc
Typhoon Mk.Ib
Whirlwind Mk.I
Mustang Mk.I
Boston Mk.III
B-17E

Bf109G-1
Fw190A-3
Do217E

would be possible

than a huge one with a new map, a Cyreneika map, scenario Tobruk 42 (i would like 41, butthan there would be no Spit ).
planes,
Bf109F-4/Trop
Bf109F-4/B/Trop
Ju88A-4
Ju87D-1
Mc202_VII
SM79

Hurricane Mk.IIc Vokes
Hurricane Mk.IId Vokes
Spitfire Mk.Vc Abukir
Kittyhawk Mk.III
P-40F
Boston Mk.III
Baltimore Mk.III
as examples.
even RN carrieroperations could be added here.
i prefer a Cyreinka over a Malta scenario because Malto lacks the close support air-to-ground action....


than Easternfront, my personal favorite would be the Battle of Kursk 1943.
almost all planes that make fun in air-to-air (109G,190A,Yak9,La5,P-39) and air-to-ground (bombers, IL2, Hs129, Bf110,Fw190F)could be moddeld
This "possible" Battel of Moskau (operation Taifun) winter 41/42 would be just earlier planes, but also not few to choose from..............

THAN in the far east, but what scenario.........not easy.
perhaps a Solomons 42 map. shore based and carrier action........ (hence the Grumman "proplem" ?!)
August 1942 and later
A6M2-N
A6M2 Model 21
A6M3 Model 32
Ki-43-Ic 18. December 42 Rabaul, 11th Sentai
D3A1
B5N2
G4M1

F4F-4
P-400 (from 22. august,67th FS)
SBD-3
TBF-1
P-40F 12.November 42, 68th FS/ 347th FG
P-38F November 42, 339th FS
B-17F

Carriers:
Shokaku
light carrier Ryujo
Saratoga
Enterprise

Carrier Battles:
East Solomons 24. august 42
Santa Cruz 26.Oktober 42




all just personal 'dreams' .... and i am speaking of some years of developmtnet here

But with a few changes . . . after BOB/ COD release. Then have a late war campaign. Then a mid war for Pacific.

Reasoning is on HL, there are more people liking late war stuff . . . most servers are late war.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-17-2011, 07:24 PM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hiro View Post



Then have a late war campaign. Then a mid war for Pacific.

Reasoning is on HL, there are more people liking late war stuff . . . most servers are late war.
Ha those people should be then punished with a Spanish Civil war or Sino-Japanese conflict add on.
If you went by that you could skip prop planes all together and then go for 1950´s Jets and play Korean war and say CoD is a waste of time....

I am hoping that the early war fans do not have just those choices and RoF.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 01-17-2011, 07:56 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

as mostly flying bombers on dogfightservers, i hate late war. Only über canon and speed fightermonsters. actually few chances for bombers to get through your target. Escort is seldom. Propably the most fighters "fear" the slow and long approach of the bomber and that they get no chance for 'their' kills........................

my favorite time the last years online were the early MTO campaigns in the VOW (COOP war).
No canons (or very few), nice a long fighterduels and as a bomber you had a chance - in a SM79 actually a very good one

because of that , as mentioned, my favorite MTO would have been Tobruk 41 (109E, Mc200,Hurricane,Tomahawk). With these fighters the bombers have a chance . But the most players 'want' THEIR Spitfire or 109F i guess because of that a 42 scenario would be the better choice for MAddox........

Last edited by JG53Frankyboy; 01-17-2011 at 08:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 01-17-2011, 08:21 PM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
as mostly flying bombers on dogfightservers, i hate late war. Only über canon and speed fightermonsters. actually few chances for bombers to get through your target. Escort is seldom. Propably the most fighters "fear" the slow and long approach of the bomber and that they get no chance for 'their' kills........................
exactly for that reason I am hoping for some early war add ons! A invasion of Poland, a battle of France or a nicely made pre WWII Pacific add on would be wonderfull!
As with the late war maps it is a waste of time taking a bomber....you might as well paint a target on your forehead.
Planes I am hoping they might become flyable one day:













Oh well guess hope dies last.......
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 01-17-2011, 08:21 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

but this early MTO thing had the 'charme' that not much totaly new planes would have to be modelled. a lot of the "CoD" planes could be used with modifications

SoW:MTO for 1940/41

Libya/Cyreneika and Sicily/Malta maps

Bf109E-7/Trop
Bf110D
Ju87B/R
Ju88A-5
He111H with Torpedoarmament available

G.50
Cr.42
MC.200
SM.79-II
Br.20M
Ba.65 <- doutbfull, any sources of cockpits ?

Gladiator II
Hurricane Ia Vokes
Hurricane IIb Vokes
Tomahawk IIb
Blenheim IV
Wellington Ic
SeaGladiator
Fulmar I
SeaHurricane Ib
Swordfish

For FAA operations:
Carriers
HMS Illustrious
HMS Eagle
HMS Audacity


Totaly new would be:
MC.200
Tomahawk
Fulmar
Swordfish
SM.79
Ba.65

The rest would be modifications from the SoW:BoB planes, if AI or flyable.
Ju88A-5 would actually be very differ from Ju88A-1 , espacially in cockpit.



it looks like im bored, but i did these researches a long time ago actually

Last edited by JG53Frankyboy; 01-17-2011 at 08:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 01-17-2011, 09:52 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

+1000000000000000000 for more early war content.

And more flying boats!!!!!!!!!

__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.