#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Come on guys, think ahead a bit here:
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHICH U.S. COMPANY MADE YOUR FAVOURITE PLANE/SHIP/VEHICLE AS THERE IS NOW LEGAL PRECEDENT. This means any US firm that swallowed up any of the manufacturers of ships/aircraft/vehicles could now sue for the unauthorised modelling of "their" intellectual property, not just NG. By folding on this issue, Ubi opened the door to all US companies that either built - or bought up a manufacturer - of any of these things to be a potential source of litigation. As for the IJN/IJA side of the equation, I understood that the lack of flyable Kate and others, is more to do with a lack of verifiable data with regards to cockpits and instrumentation, tho there is a chance that the same legal issue might be a factor with the Japanese (ex)aero-industry companies. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I have a question about ''intellectual property''.
What about F4U-4,-5,-7... It was made before Grumman acquired Vough, do they own any rights or can this plane be made ? I'm no lawyer, just asking. Last edited by dFrog; 01-10-2011 at 08:19 PM. Reason: spelling |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
As far as understand, you buy a company you automatically *buy* the intellectual property of that concern be it new inventions or the design of stock that was bought by the governmant on behalf of the people 70 years ago.
Just grand ain't it? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Well yes. I forgot to add that Grumman sold Vough. It was bought by Carlyle and renamed Vought Aircraft Industries.
Who's the owner of rights now ? |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Yep, I have enough references about the Kate's cockpit(s).
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Cheers, Fafnir_6 |
|
|