Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2011, 12:45 AM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

How about a non mod Zekes?

I miss the Pacific.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2011, 09:59 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

While i also like to fly on Spit vs 109, i do believe that the server hosts too much med to late war scenarios.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2011, 10:09 AM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

I prefer Escuadron 69 server, very good ping, all realistic.
The bad thing is that hardly ever there's some people
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2011, 11:01 AM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
While i also like to fly on Spit vs 109, i do believe that the server hosts too much med to late war scenarios.
Absolutely agree on that, early war maps do not seem to be popular.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:10 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

I love the North Africa.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2011, 10:59 AM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
How about a non mod Zekes?

I miss the Pacific.
That would be nice, but you do know how big the gaps are in aircraft, to make half ways realistic maps? I will just mention there are absolutely no flyable IJA bombers and only two IJN Bombers available of which both are early versions.
Pearl Harbour map without flyable Kates? Just using Vals to sink battleships is calling for people with extrem patiance.....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-03-2011, 11:56 AM
[URU]BlackFox [URU]BlackFox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
How about a non mod Zekes?

I miss the Pacific.
I read in their forum that ZekevsWildcat is going 4.10m in a few days, so your wishes may come true (or not, depending on the planeset ).

I'm also waiting impatiently to fly some pacific missions onlline in 4.10.

Edit: Faust is reconsidering since there have been many complaints about planeset limitatoins for the blue side in the Pacific (lack of bombers/torpedo bombers). So let's just wait and see.

Last edited by [URU]BlackFox; 01-03-2011 at 01:20 PM. Reason: New information from the original forum.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:21 PM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [URU]BlackFox View Post
I read in their forum that ZekevsWildcat is going 4.10m in a few days, so your wishes may come true (or not, depending on the planeset ).

I'm also waiting impatiently to fly some pacific missions onlline in 4.10.
Yeah ever wondered how maps like Pearl Harbour or Midway are going to work with 4.10m?
Only flyable planes on the Japanese side A6M-21 and the Val......have fun trying to sink battleships with those planes...... that is going to take a awful lot of 250kg bombs not counting the 60kg bombs that Val can also load to sink a big ship like a battleship.
Sorry with 4.10 alone you can forget a lot of pacific missions, unless realism is something unimportant, and you wish to replace missing aircraft with any kind of available aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:34 PM
[URU]BlackFox [URU]BlackFox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Default

Aren't you up to challenges?

I just updated my original post, there's a discussion about it in their forum. Many complaints about the lack of planes, etc. It would be an interesting challenge anyway, but not suitable for online play where everybody cares about points.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-03-2011, 02:27 PM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [URU]BlackFox View Post
Aren't you up to challenges?

I just updated my original post, there's a discussion about it in their forum. Many complaints about the lack of planes, etc. It would be an interesting challenge anyway, but not suitable for online play where everybody cares about points.
Online challenge....right how about Ki 27s against late P-38s
Are you then up to flying the crap planes?
Most here in this thread are there also in that forum.
That server is at least trying for realism and not "challenge" as you put it.
Would like to see the reaction if on the Spits vs 109s server the odds where set to P-11´s against Me 262s or Fiseler Storchs against late Spitfires.....I am certain all would talk about "Challenge" sorry that is just loony.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.