|
King's Bounty: Armored Princess Sequel to the critically acclaimed King’s Bounty: The Legend. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
age of wonders is a turn based magic medieeval game
where u control a main hero and units to conquer enemy cities it's quite addictive actually but aow >aow 2 big time |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I still have AoW and AoW2 Shadow Magic, but I never really cared for II.
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But now, two years later, I feel that King's Bounty TL, AP and now Crossworlds to be far in advance of Disciples III in every department except for art direction, where Disciples III is excellent. But a pretty game doesn't make for a fun game. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
How you can like this abomination of Disciples series is really beyond my understanding and imagination.
Homm5 , Majesty 2, Disciples 3... ech Russians are really good in destroying sequels of my favorites games. <cry> Katauri Interactive make exception from this with KB. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Homm5 was the only game I jerked off my system the fisrt day and returned to the store.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
homm5 was decent but had alot of patches to become good(but never compared to homm3) and it's mods disciples 3 is quite a good game(but they fucked it with the mass amount of bugs in it) and the race reduced to only 3 it could have been a great game if they only didn't mess with the disciples 2 setup which was near perfect for that game (the only good thing they did was enhance the graphics) props for that |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I thought Majesty 2 was a decent game. I got repetitive somewhere in the middle, but I thought it was well done and I had fun with it. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I loved AOW and AOW2, I didn't care really care for Overlord though... i found that taking the click out of point and click combat really made the gameplay a bit shallow. (Triumph Studios).
Disicipes 2 was a great game, though I tired of it after several campaigns and didn't play all the expansions. As for the Russian Strategy Developers. Katauri: Smashing brilliant success. If their next title was "Poo in a Box", I bet that poo would be well developed and well worth the money. Nival: Developed Silent Storm, a couple games I didn't play, and then HOMM5. I enjoyed Silent Storm a lot and felt it featured a great turn based strategy engine. In terms of gameplay and features, it had a LOT. I can see why people wouldn't like the wonky story though. HOMM5 was alright. Akella: Made Disciples III. Haven't played it but heard some bad things about it. They WERE working on Jagged Alliance 3 prior to Disciples... Perhaps its a good thing they stopped? Czech Developer Altar: Made a bunch of those newer gen UFO games. I appreciate their efforts in trying to modernize an old franchise and hammer out its flaws... but they've lost a lot of the appeal of the original product. I for one am glad the Russians are working on turn based strategies. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Well, at least some of you guys could play D3. I am in America so my box version came with the put the original disk bug even though I had the original disk. To get the patch for this wonderful DRM you need to email the folks at kalypso. Some of my friends couldn't even get that thing to install. The patch also took quite a bit of time to develop, considering that legit players couldn't even get the game to start. The only way around the problem for quite sometime was to download a no CD crack.
No thank you, for my money I would like a game that I can actually play without having to email the developer and hope that I get a response back allowing me to play when I have already paid. The game has some potential but the NA release was butchered to say the least. Heck, gamestop even let me get a full refund because every single copy that they had was unplayable in one way or the other. Disciples 2 was a great title and it is very disappointing to see a sequel butchered, particularly one that was a long time coming and greatly anticipated. |
|
|