![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My settings
Small soft response curves on all rotational axes Translational axes depend on the sim - with an optical HUD, linear, with ring and bead, small soft. also (for IL-2): ![]() ![]() ![]() This might be useful for anyone new to electronics, who is thinking about making their own: ![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thank you julian265, i'll try your settings
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have Freetrack working in IL1946 with 3 point 6DOF (mod required) and find that having a small reduction in sensitivity on the axis profile curves (as described in the FT user manual) makes a big difference! I am amazed at the difference using head Tracking makes. I used to fly in virtual view but now I am hooked into cockpit view only and re- starting all my favourite campaigns/missions.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm pretty sure that BOP is the console predecessor to WOP.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BOP - the unfinished console version that the publishers abandoned!
WOP - the unfinished PC version that the Devs abandoned! Thank gawd for IL1946............and its stable...... ![]() |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not the thread jack, just a quick review on a similar free product:
I downloaded FaceTrackNoIR last night and spent a few hours getting it set up. Today I had the opportunity to fly offline combat with it. Here are my impressions: It has IL-2 support. All that really means is it is recognized by IL-2 and there are ready made sensitivity settings for this sim. Unfortunately, those settings only really get you in the ballpark. I found that I had to made the "yaw" settings pretty high to be able to look over my shoulders. The 'pitch" settings (look up/down) also had to be set high. It has taken a LOT of tweaking to get it to run. And when it runs, it runs WELL. It's s totally different combat experience when the view changes as you move your head. Unfortunately here again, it loses tack of your face on a regular basis. My view control then defaults to the HAT switch on my stick, which is ok. But, it is a bit of resource hog. Really, it's just a CPU hog. As it searches again for your face, there is a noticeable slow down in performance. So now I am betwixt and between. I now feel I NEED such a system for simming, but this one is not quite ready (it is a WiP too LOL). TrackIR may be in my future, I just hate giving my wife any more ammunition to use against me for my gaming geekiness. Splitter |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have you not tried Freetrack? It certainly exceeded my expectations. I run in 'Perfect' and no problems whatsoever with performance issues or checking my 6. Never tried the Natural Point Track IR to make a comparison but at the moment I am more than happy with Freetrack and would rather spend the dosh on a Saitek X52 stick!
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I really don't want to go through the trouble of building a cap for the game. Splitter |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
To use the TrackIR cap you would probably need to get some sort of bright infrared light source and point it at it. |
![]() |
|
|