Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 06-24-2010, 08:09 AM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville View Post
I have to laugh at your spiteful hate campaign against ROF, El. Just to make it clear, ROF is a Flight Simulator, maybe you are looking for another title. 'Rise of the Crash Test Dummies', perhaps? Show us your vast library of photographs with WWI aircraft buried nose first 4ft in the ground please? Most photographs you will find they are a crumpled heap, some more disintegration is in evidence.

This of course is a real 'deal breaker' in a combat sim, as we all immediately switch to an external view to watch our foe crash when in the middle of a furball don't we? Does wonders for SA. There are actually some very impressive ROF crashes if one bothers to look for them on youtube, not saying they are perfect as they should be, but its a very minor, tertiary and inconsequential 'gripe', if you can even call it that. We don't see planes disintegrate into a million pieces. Lawks, the sim is doomed.

As to the comments about diving full speed from 4000 metres, err the plane will disintegrate well before that when exceeding its Vne, as in real life........so a wee bit irrelevant.

El has been saying that 'Rise of Flight' is 'in its last days' since roughly, lets say......3 days into its release? 1 year on it is unrecognisable from its earlier (lets face it Beta) state and vastly improved. I would take what he says with a pinch of salt, as he actually knows very little about WWI aircraft (not that I'm a world authority myself mind, still learning), as evidenced by his slightly less than illuminating contributions over on SimHq.

Yes, Oleg criticised elements of the DM on initial release (as did I in the same thread, before Oleg did. He also praised its simulation of physics and was overall positive about it. It is much better a little over a year on.

El, you don't like ROF, its not for you. Ok, we get it and you are of course entitled to your opinion. Fine and dandy, but I don't understand what you 'get' from constantly and spitefully bashing it? Call yourself a flight sim fan? Yeah, right......try to bury the only WWI sim there is likely to be for some time.

There are sims I don't like, but I don't go around bashing them constantly, what purpose would it serve? Why would I want to do that? Maybe El should ask himself that same question. If he says 'I care about standards' I will fall of my chair laughing, because his constructive criticism of ROF was negligible if not non existent.

Get over it El, nothing personal but it is beyond me why you do this. ROF is in my opinion now an excellent (not perfect) sim.....I would recommend it to anyone interested in WWI aviation. The 'feel' of flight surpasses anything out there by a country mile. Still a ways to go......(2 seaters coming up and revamped career mode amongst other things).

Had some great fun playing it and yes still very much looking forward to SOW, room for both in the world.....they are not in competition.

Oh and I fly as 'Biggles07' if anyone wants to shoot me down in flames online, I wont take it personally.

Peace be with you all.
The reason he is bashing RoF in this perticullar case, i think, is because people uses RoF as an example of how to do things, wich in manys opinion is, a bad example.

A year into RoF release iv learned NOT to say anything bad about it, because u WILL be hunted down, wherever u are. (A main reason why i stay as far away as possible from RoF at this point)
In my opinion RoF is a broken sim, granted, if u like just flying arround doing pretty much nothing ist ok but concidering its 5-10 years newer than any competition it doesnt surpasses anything, it fairs well (mainly in the grphics department ) nothing more.

And im quite sure Oleg WONT be looking at RoF for pointers in how to create SoW.

There are many things i dont like about RoF, a development team comming from IL2 succesully missing to implement even 1 good thing from theire experiance (empty SP/MP, Team Death Mach, Capture The Flag.....wth??) is one and a development team not beeing financially backed up from the get go just doesnt instill confidance, is one, beeing told on variouse forums that there is nothing wrong with RoF, youre the one whose broken, is another.

Could we just agree not to bring RoF into the SoW debate, RoF has nothing SoW wants. (That is really not an attempt at an insult, its just the way it is)

I can understand that many who like RoF think it gets treated unfair, but so what, just leave it be and enjoy your game. Exept the fact that there are many who wholhartedly dissagrees with u.


P.S. The giddyness of getting a windstock implemented in the game, whats up with that?


Edit: As for bending on impact, im not an expert either but a solid object (what ever its made of) doesnt stay in on piece and bounce (RoF) if plowed strait into the ground a 200 mph, it just doesnt.

Last edited by Baron; 06-24-2010 at 08:50 AM.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.