Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 06-05-2010, 11:02 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

@Mysticpuma and Tbag:

I do 3D modelling myself and there is no visual improvement between the SoW models that have been shown and that B-17, at all. At least from a polycount point of view. Every poly more than the SoW models have is a waste and pretty much inefficient.

As for the textures, take a look at this shot of the B-17:

http://www.a2asimulations.com/wingso...eenshots/4.jpg

Without the polished finished it actually looks rather dreary compared to the SoW models.

Besides, why would you want to absolve a combat simulator from its very purpose, simulating combat, just to look at a plane model, which you could do better in an environment like FSX? That doesn't makesense to me at all.
  #112  
Old 06-06-2010, 12:18 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Will we be able to open the sliding sections of the 109 canopy? May give a slightly better view to the front.

Cheers!
  #113  
Old 06-06-2010, 12:44 AM
AC_Black AC_Black is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 13
Default

LOVE THOSE PICS.. EXCELLENT!! Thank you very much for the up dates, looking forward to the release.
__________________
Honor is the Only thing to hold true!
http://www.caf96th.com
  #114  
Old 06-06-2010, 01:06 AM
zauii zauii is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin View Post
@Mysticpuma and Tbag:

I do 3D modelling myself and there is no visual improvement between the SoW models that have been shown and that B-17, at all. At least from a polycount point of view. Every poly more than the SoW models have is a waste and pretty much inefficient.

As for the textures, take a look at this shot of the B-17:

http://www.a2asimulations.com/wingso...eenshots/4.jpg

Without the polished finished it actually looks rather dreary compared to the SoW models.

Besides, why would you want to absolve a combat simulator from its very purpose, simulating combat, just to look at a plane model, which you could do better in an environment like FSX? That doesn't makesense to me at all.
Quoted for truth.

Well said.
  #115  
Old 06-06-2010, 02:28 AM
Tbag Tbag is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin View Post
@Mysticpuma and Tbag:

I do 3D modelling myself and there is no visual improvement between the SoW models that have been shown and that B-17, at all. At least from a polycount point of view. Every poly more than the SoW models have is a waste and pretty much inefficient.

As for the textures, take a look at this shot of the B-17:

http://www.a2asimulations.com/wingso...eenshots/4.jpg

Without the polished finished it actually looks rather dreary compared to the SoW models.

Besides, why would you want to absolve a combat simulator from its very purpose, simulating combat, just to look at a plane model, which you could do better in an environment like FSX? That doesn't makesense to me at all.
Don't you like to model Bombs with lots of polys?

Judging by your last comment you wouldn't mind to stick to the graphics of IL2 and only improve the physics. I don't believe that you really mean that. Furthermore, you can do as much 3D modelling as you like but if you can't see a visual improvement between the different models (SoW and A2A) you must be somewhat blind. Just look at the nose section of the 109 or the engine cowlings of the Ju88 or Wellington - lots of ugly(ish) edges.

Now don't get me wrong: I can appreciate that there is a tradeoff between graphics and physics modelling and I'm happy with the SoW 3D models that we've seen so far. I'd just be a little happier if they looked more like that A2A B17.
  #116  
Old 06-06-2010, 02:32 AM
Blakduk Blakduk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 175
Default

The way this sim is coming together is simply BRILLIANT!
I love the details such as the individual damage modelling of the prop blades, and the 109 cockpit looks almost too good to be true.
What's really exciting for me is the view of the furball near the coast with the 109 about to dive in.
I can hardly wait to see a video from inside the cockpit of a plane diving through clouds- one thing i believe IL2 didn't do well was the transparency of clouds when going through them. In IL2 you only have to touch the edge of a cloud and you're blinded- i hope this new engine manages it better.
You're raising the standard for all other games/sims Oleg- well done.... and keep going!
  #117  
Old 06-06-2010, 02:37 AM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbag View Post
Don't you like to model Bombs with lots of polys?

Judging by your last comment you wouldn't mind to stick to the graphics of IL2 and only improve the physics. I don't believe that you really mean that. Furthermore, you can do as much 3D modelling as you like but if you can't see a visual improvement between the different models (SoW and A2A) you must be somewhat blind. Just look at the nose section of the 109 or the engine cowlings of the Ju88 or Wellington - lots of ugly(ish) edges.

Now don't get me wrong: I can appreciate that there is a tradeoff between graphics and physics modelling and I'm happy with the SoW 3D models that we've seen so far. I'd just be a little happier if they looked more like that A2A B17.
I only increased the polygon count to a pount where there was no gain for overall quality beyond it, just like the SoW models. It is easy to throw around with polys, but there is no real gain in the longrun to do it just because you can.

Besides, where are those ugly edges on the Bf109 cowling? I can't see any. All I can make out are rough contours due to the lack of AA.

  #118  
Old 06-06-2010, 02:45 AM
Tbag Tbag is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

All the little bumps and the air filter, they don't blend in with the rest of the model but have a very sharp "edge" where you can count the polys. Also, the parts of the aircraft that you can see from within the cockpit look rather crude compared to the A2A models.
  #119  
Old 06-06-2010, 03:51 AM
Defender Defender is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Default

Mmmmmhmmm! My re-introduction to WWII flight sims will be an epic one...no doubt.

Outstanding work to the team!
  #120  
Old 06-06-2010, 04:31 AM
heywooood's Avatar
heywooood heywooood is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: peoples republic of ocean beach
Posts: 103
Default

Oleg - it is good to see your personal updates again with some regularity - like you used to do in il2 days...

Is SoW going to use open GL or DX12 for rendering?

will we be able to adjust things like gamma correction in the game GUI, just as in Rise of Flight? and will there be other items like they call 'post effects' ?

Since there was so much complaining by fans in il2 days regarding 'muzzle flash' and engine 'lawnmower' sounds and MG sounds - have you considered making those effects adjustable in the game (maybe by use of a slider to increase/decrease the visual or audio depth) within the GUI ?

thank you for continuing to work on PC combat flight simulations - I think I can speak for many when I say we are fortunate to have you and your tremendous dedication (and whole team @ Maddox as well)...

Is Ilya (Luthier) still with you and is there still a Korean era flight sim in the works?
__________________
"I'm afraid I'm not at liberty to discuss this"


the Sandman...
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.