![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oleg...is this so...No authentic Spitfire for SoW...It is a TRAGEDY for me...and us...So many Years of believe that SoW is the REAL BOB SIMULATOR...
It seems we would not be able to join "The Few" in to the skies...but we will have nice ARCADE SHOOTER... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm hoping for authenticity too, but at the end of the day this is a game. It won't be perfect and it won't recreate every facet of 1940 England as some people have been hoping for in other threads. Please keep things in perspective! Last edited by kendo65; 05-22-2010 at 09:08 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
All RAF planes used similar lay-out blindflyingpanels, but even those differ in models, rectangular like the one in the attachment and rounded-off versions as seen in above picture.
For as I know instrumentpanels were fitted with parts at hand so Spitfires used by the same flight could differ. Attachment panel is in use by the Dutch MkIX |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hurricane Mk1 and Spitfire Mk1 in the BoB only had the square type blind flying panels. The way to tell the difference if holding both and not knowing which is for which aircraft is that the spitfire panel has a larger radiused curve top left, why...to allow function of the flaps up/down lever, else the corner gets in the way.
The curved top came later after the BoB. Surviving spitfire Mk1's cannot be used as accurate reference for what the BoB pit looked like, with the exception of the Spitfire Mk1 at Cosford, it sat at Hendon many years called a Mk1 but inside it had seen changes taking it beyond what it should have looked like during the BoB, let alone during the period that its paint scheme represented. Therein lies the dangers of believing what you see in a Mk1 is what it was like during the BoB. It was restored to Mk1 May 1939 spec by MAPS. Cockpit doesnt represent BoB in that it has a ring and bead gunsight. I bypass the dangers of studying preserved aircraft by seeing what they had when frozen in time, the moment of the crash. If I see this part in a preserved aircraft then I can better details from it as its complete. Aircraft undergo changes, Supermarine were forever issuing amendments and if you look at the MkII spitfire instrument panel drawing (there isnt one for the Mk1) you will see down the left side the amendments and when they were issued. As each amendment comes out its added to the master drawing. I meant the survey to gauge simmers wishes, should there be a chance for a refit. No way can we go telling Oleg and co what we want, we can but form an 'orderly queue' and let him gauge the length of it and decide himself. BOBC |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
BOBC,
Sadly i can hold only the Spitfire Mk IX parts, so i haven't noticed the little difference before. I'm still looking for a good Mk V mainpanel blueprint with measurements for a simpit though. I'm sure the dev team sorts it out, i'll love flying the Mk's. After a landing accident in 2007 the Dutch Mk IX finally flies again..she's still a delight to see roaring between the clouds. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Red Too that is very intellectual discussion. Himmm , informative post discussion it is.
Have you heard about plan crash accident because of bee in the cockpit. Next time I will share a link of that video on youtube. That is very strange to hear about. |
![]() |
|
|