Patch 4.10 - Development Updates by Daidalos Team

[Corsican Corsair]

Hi DT,

For P-51 & YP-80, we have the K-14 gyro gunsight. Maybe, it will be a good idea to fit P-47 with this device and, still better, to fit last German fighter with Revi EZ 40 or 42 gyro gunsight. There is enough data, by example on http://www.cockpitinstrumente.de/, to do that. Regards.

[Ala13_Kokakolo]

Originally Posted by Corsican Corsair

Hi DT,

For P-51 & YP-80, we have the K-14 gyro gunsight. Maybe, it will be a good idea to fit P-47 with this device and, still better, to fit last German fighter with Revi EZ 40 or 42 gyro gunsight. There is enough data, by example on http://www.cockpitinstrumente.de/, to do that. Regards

Leave them alone!!! I polish my x65f everyday waiting for the release of 4.10 with the possibility of using one throttle per engine!!!

[robtek]

Maybe its about time for a public beta????
There are so many idio..,strike that, ehm.. Experts running free who can find any possible fault, if not more

[Corsican Corsair]

Originally Posted by Ala13_Kokakolo

Leave them alone!!!

It was a simple suggestion for the future...

[Daniël]

Can the Bv 246 "Hagelkorn" gliding bomb be added to 4.10, or is it too late for 4.10?
I would appreciate that very much if it could be added to 4.10.
A few pictures:
http://users.atw.hu/priskos/Alakulat...elkorn_350.jpg

http://www.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=h...26tbs%3Disch:1

[robtek]

@Daniel

it seems to me that there will be NO additions to something thats already in the beta-testing phase!!!

sometimes wishes have to regard reality.

[KG26_Alpha]

Well Done

Copy and Paste at last

Nice to see the development time line too.

Re: HS129 AP for the Bk 37 ? iirc its got HE at the moment.

Edit: Spelling

[N2O]

I have an offer (or the request – as want):
If it is impossible to give at least rough date of an exit 4.10, whether that it is impossible to specify us, at least the exact period when it doesn't leave? For example: the next week (to 11/5/2010) 4.10 precisely don't wait.

Ask what for it it is necessary? What would people not check infinitely «instead of whether have laid out a patch?...» - constant expectation not too pleasant condition. And from work distracts If in a week term yet doesn't approach – it is possible to prolong it for a week and so on (I hope it it is not required …). Будте are assured – will receive a patch before promised "absenteeism" more pleasantly, than constantly to wait

At the same time it doesn't impose any obligations on DT as isn't the promise to let out 4.10 to this date.

I think many who on 10 times in the course of the day checks this branch me will support.

In Russian:

У меня есть предложение (или просьба – как хотите):
Если нельзя дать хотя бы ориентировочную дату выхода 4.10, то нельзя ли указать нам, хотя бы точный период, когда он не выйдет? К примеру: в ближайшую неделю (до 5.11.2010) 4.10 точно не ждите.

Спросите зачем это надо? Что бы люди не проверяли бесконечно «а не выложили ли патч?...» - постоянное ожидание не слишком приятное состояние. Да и от работы отвлекает Если же через неделю срок еще не подойдет – можно продлить его еще на неделю и так далее (надеюсь этого не потребуется…). Будте уверены – получить патч раньше обещанного «невыхода» будет приятнее, чем постоянно ждать

В то же время это не накладывает никаких обязательств на DT так как не является обещанием выпустить 4.10 к этой дате.

Думаю многие, кто по 10 раз на дню проверяет эту ветку меня поддержат.

[Aximand]

Yes! I like that way! Then ill can "rest in pease" during this period..

[steam]

n2o
+ 1
In this case it does not flood. This means that this option will suit many people

In Russian:
В данном случае это не флуд. Это означает, что такой вариант устроит многих людей