Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:07 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default Virtual pilot's feedback to the player: G-Force

This thread is about discussing an adequate way to provide the player with all those tacit informations available to a real pilot.

Actually ingame we have only 2 feedbacks: the pilot's current health status (healthy/wounded/dead) and G effect on the circulatory system.

Is evident that we lack many important informations: some are actually simulated by the game, but with no feedback to the player, while other are not really implemented even if they are of primary relevance in a flight combat simulator.

Suggestions are welcomed.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-25-2012 at 08:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2012, 10:48 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

G Force

Human body is an accelerometer: it captures the strenght and the direction of the imposed G forces.

Of course it can't really measure those forces in a detailed way (because of this we find mechanical accelerometers in many planes).

Here's is a way to display it to the player:

Neutral G:


Right turn climb (Light G):


Right turn climb (Medium G):


Right turn climb (Heavy G):


For a full 3D accellerometer:



A better version, more recognizable, is this one:

Where the red area is blinking.

Of course it should be resizable.

But why should this be important? Fatigue simulation.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-24-2012 at 12:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2012, 11:35 AM
Sammi79 Sammi79 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 124
Default

Just a thought, I like your accelerometer but it would be fairly straight forward and intuitive way to simply use relative head movement, so the viewpoint is pushed in the mean direction of the G force to a greater or lesser degree.

I guess this would require a bit of careful tuning to work alongside 6DOF head trackers, but the visual cue for G in this way works very well and can trick your brain into something approaching 'feeling' as when G forces shift rapidly the resultant head movement would be very pronounced.

Regards,
Sam.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2012, 11:44 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammi79 View Post
Just a thought, I like your accelerometer but it would be fairly straight forward and intuitive way to simply use relative head movement, so the viewpoint is pushed in the mean direction of the G force to a greater or lesser degree.

I guess this would require a bit of careful tuning to work alongside 6DOF head trackers, but the visual cue for G in this way works very well and can trick your brain into something approaching 'feeling' as when G forces shift rapidly the resultant head movement would be very pronounced.

Regards,
Sam.
I know Sam, I thought to the head movement too at first... it's more intuitive. Then I've realized that not all the players can afford a TiR device... it could be nice to implement them both and leave the choice to the player.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-24-2012 at 11:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2012, 01:04 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Also the head movement should increase with the increasing fatigue level, that works also without TIR as long as the movement is limited not to loose sight of the sights.
It could be related to the TIR-setting in the conf.ini -> No TIR -> less movement; with TIR -> more movement which can be neutralized by actual head movement.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-2012, 06:36 AM
Allons! Allons! is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 196
Default

PLEASE dont let them fiddle with TrackIR its already not optimal so no need to get this worse..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-2012, 08:59 AM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Head mvmt was already implemented and it was good.

A lot of players complained about the difficulty to get a good view of the visor (and that was true). But it gave a good sensation of G forces acting on the pilot.

However I like your idea of blinking ring to give an indication of the pilot fatigue. May be some lines of code could be implemented as well to reflect it according to your proposal with muscular fatigue : pull 5G for X minute and your pilot response will be sluggish.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2012, 09:12 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Anyway, with TiR or not, the strenght of the force needs to be visible to the player.

About the outer circle in the new version my idea was:
- transparent => no loss of stamina
- yellow => light loss of stamina
- red => moderate loss of stamina
- blinking red => high loss of stamina

Of course the ranges are dinamic: it's not the force on the plane, it's the one on the pilot whose posture in cockpit and G-suit really influence the effects on the body.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-25-2012 at 09:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2012, 09:14 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Some documents:

http://spacemedicineassociation.org/...1956/27003.pdf
http://csel.eng.ohio-state.edu/voshell/gforce.pdf
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.