Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #481  
Old 10-20-2012, 03:16 PM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
Let's not make this about one political personality or party. The issue is copyright and patent trolling, which cuts across political lines.

I am of the opinion that N-G's trademark claims to any product produced for the U.S. government before or during WW2 is unsustainable, for a number of reasons I've already mentioned.

It also appears that their IP policies are inconsistent. They allow trademark free use of pictures of their past products, but not 3d computer images or simulations? How is a 3d image not art? Why should use of that art in a video game be any different from a static picture of that object in an old-school tabletop game?

I'm not a lawyer and I'm not sure how one would start a campaign to overturn crap like N-G is doing. There are a number of petition sites, which could be used to bring attention to the issue, but I'm not sure how to frame it.
Not only that this issue with NG has been going on since ... 2003-2004 hasn't it?
  #482  
Old 10-20-2012, 03:52 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat View Post
Not only that this issue with NG has been going on since ... 2003-2004 hasn't it?
At least...

There were lawsuits against plastic model makers, die cast makers, and the latest one I know about was launched against EA for the inclusion of the AH-1Z Viper helicopter in Battlefield 3.

It's not just N-G but it applies to us because of what went on in the past.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #483  
Old 10-20-2012, 09:10 PM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster_Dee View Post
I've always thought we should create characatures of NG planes--really ugly, waddling, nasal-sounding ones. When you fire the guns, the wings fall off.

Maybe possums for nose art....
Folks have suggested implementing facsimiles like "Gormann Revenger" to get around the litigation wall. Unfortunately, that would compromise IL-2's reputation and responsibility to serve as an educational tool.

As far as I am aware, there's nothing stopping other modders from making pits to some of these aircraft. It would be nice if they were of the same consistency and quality as DT's stuff.

Last edited by Luno13; 10-20-2012 at 09:14 PM.
  #484  
Old 10-21-2012, 12:14 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luno13 View Post
As far as I am aware, there's nothing stopping other modders from making pits to some of these aircraft. It would be nice if they were of the same consistency and quality as DT's stuff.
Exactly. The best argument for mods is that "crowd-sourced" copyright violations defeat unjust copyright/trademark laws since there are no obvious players or "deep pockets" for the corporate lawyers to take down.

The only problem is that TD is arguably the best modding team out there, so it's hard for other modders to reach their standards.
  #485  
Old 10-21-2012, 03:40 AM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

Not always. DT often work with other individuals and groups in order to get content included in the official release.
  #486  
Old 10-21-2012, 06:57 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Any news/updates for 4.12?
  #487  
Old 10-21-2012, 10:58 AM
Asheshouse Asheshouse is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
At least...

-- and the latest one I know about was launched against EA for the inclusion of the AH-1Z Viper helicopter in Battlefield 3.
I think the case was actually a pre-emptive one by EA against the manufacturers to cease their trademark claims. I wouldn't be surprised if it was subject to an out of court settlement to prevent a precedent being created.
Quote:
The lawsuit says that on Dec. 21, Textron lawyers demanded that EA cease its depiction of three Bell aircraft in Battlefield 3. Electronic Arts asserts that its depiction of the three aircraft are protected by the First Amendment and the doctrine of nominative fair use. The three helicopters in question are the AH-1Z Viper, an attack helicopter; the UH-1Y, a multipurpose/transport helicopter; and the V-22 Osprey, whose distinctive tilt-rotors allow for vertical and short takeoff and landing. EA's complaint said:
"The parties have been unable to resolve their dispute. EA therefore has a reasonable and strong apprehension that it will soon face a trademark and/or trade dress action from Textron.
The Bell-manufactured helicopters depicted in Battlefield 3 are just a few of countless creative visual, audio, plot and programming elements that make up EA's expressive work, a first-person military combat simulation."
But perhaps a precedent already exists?
Quote:
EA recently won a similar lawsuit against Rutgers University regarding the the use of quarterback Ryan Hart's likeness in NCAA Football. The court ruled that EA's First Amendment rights trumped Hart's rights to control his own image.

Last edited by Asheshouse; 10-21-2012 at 11:07 AM.
  #488  
Old 10-21-2012, 08:39 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheshouse View Post
But perhaps a precedent already exists?
Actually, the case you cite isn't as applicable, since it concerns an individual's right to control his own image as opposed to a company's right to control its trademarks (and "trade dress" - basically, the appearance of a product or packaging, like the yellow border around the edge of National Geographic magazine).

In the current U.S. political climate, courts are more protective of corporate trademarks than images of public figures. If you think about it, if any public figure could sue to get images of them removed, it would completely shut down political satire among other things.

The people who are screwed by this precedent are the estates of famous dead people, like Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe - and just as well since they're the original "trademark trolls."

I think that you're right that Textron settled out of court with EA to avoid losing the case and setting a precedent. EA is big enough that it can go toe to toe in a trademark fight and Textron isn't as big a company as N-G.

Anyhow, it's moot as regards N-G/Ubisoft agreement. Also, even if there were a precedent overturning the sort of trademark trolling that N-G engages in, I doubt that either 1C or Ubisoft would want to waste legal billing hours trying to overturn an agreement for a 10-year-old game.

So, still no N-G products for IL2!
  #489  
Old 10-21-2012, 09:42 PM
DuxCorvan's Avatar
DuxCorvan DuxCorvan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cádiz, Spain
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
Although I can't speak for Dux, I imagine his comment about George Bush Senior was the tip off that this probably wasn't a political statement but rather a personal one. George Bush Senior was a TBM Avenger pilot. He was even shot down in one.
Wow, someone with a sense of irony!
  #490  
Old 10-25-2012, 11:34 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Bring on 4.12 !!!
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.