calm down

[Tone71]

Originally Posted by robtek

nice summary, bongodriver

Amidst all the arguing, and regardless of how I feel on the subject, I have to congratulate bongodriver on his summary too.

Edit: I think people would do well to just take some time out to read and re-read what he wrote on page 3.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by PotNoodles

Why say there is going to be a patch in a few days times when they already knew all was not well?

Sorry, but I don't recall them saying that there would be a patch in a few days. Do you have a link for that?

[Force10]

Originally Posted by robtek

In every developement, especially when entering new grounds, delays are to be expected

I actually agree with you robtek. But the key word is "development". The development time was from 2004 to 2011, that's when you expect the delays. After you "release" a product, you should be past the development delays since you are now asking for money for something that is supposed to work.

[robtek]

They were forced to release a not completely developed software!

Weren't they?

Or does somebody really claim CoD was finished on release?

And then they had to redevelope great parts of the core program.

[Force10]

Originally Posted by robtek

They were forced to release a not completely developed software!

Weren't they?

Or does somebody really claim CoD was finished on release?

And then they had to redevelope great parts of the core program.

And that's the customers fault? At the very least after swindling our money for something that doesn't work, they can be candid and honest. Instead, we get vague crap and misdirection instead of realistic info.

[ed-b]

Bye Dave !! Good luck with the vapourware ... ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware )

[robtek]

Originally Posted by Force10

And that's the customers fault? At the very least after swindling our money for something that doesn't work, they can be candid and honest. Instead, we get vague crap and misdirection instead of realistic info.

Oh, but it does work, not perfectly, not even very satisfactorily for quite a few, but it works good enough to have fun with it, if one wants it.

And swindling, doesn't work, vague crap, misdirecting? Thats pure badmouthing from your side.

They give us information, not the information you would like to get, but they confirm that they are working on the solution of CoD's problems.

It's not their fault that you are so unfaithful.

[Bungmiester]

Its not a matter of being unfaithful, this could be a really great flight sim unfortunataly it was mis managed and rushed out the door, frustration is what I would call it. Anyway im off down the pub.

[Feathered_IV]

Originally Posted by Tone71

Amidst all the arguing, and regardless of how I feel on the subject, I have to congratulate bongodriver on his summary too.

Edit: I think people would do well to just take some time out to read and re-read what he wrote on page 3.

Thanks, got him on the ignore list now. Don't know why I didn't do it ages ago.

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by Feathered_IV

Thanks, got him on the ignore list now. Don't know why I didn't do it ages ago.

yes, that is probably for the best for you to keep out of my way.