Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-11-2010, 07:23 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Agree with you proton45.

Look at the shots of the model then carefully look at that wonderful screenshot. It certainly looks like the fire is coming from the area of the first fuselage fuel tank and the large oxygen bottle there.

Oleg is correct, as he is more often than not.

Nothing else to see here, move along.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-11-2010, 08:52 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

..hang on a sec guv


wot 'bout the fire, I says? Ah, I says; that fire right there don' look right. Look at this, says I:



can ya see the fuselage behind tha flames, I ask? Nah, mate; you can'. Tha' fire in the screenshot looks like a lil' pussy in comparison.

Now, look here says I:

http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/wp-conten...0022-92x92.jpg

Ignore the smoke m'lads; focus on tha' roaring fire. Now, that's wha' I'm talking 'bout.

Last edited by philip.ed; 09-11-2010 at 08:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-11-2010, 09:05 PM
Meusli Meusli is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
Now, look here says I:

http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/wp-conten...0022-92x92.jpg

Ignore the smoke m'lads; focus on tha' roaring fire. Now, that's wha' I'm talking 'bout.
Lol, that's the smallest linked screen shot ever.

The thing with fire though is that it's a very changeable beast. This could be at any point in it's life, it could just be getting going and the best is to come.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-11-2010, 09:15 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Whoops, I says. Perhaps this will help; me thinks.



A good point you have, I may add.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-11-2010, 11:26 PM
bf-110's Avatar
bf-110 bf-110 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SP,Brasil
Posts: 465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
Whoops, I says. Perhaps this will help; me thinks.



A good point you have, I may add.
This fire looks awesome!I would even say it´s totally different from the FW-200 one.Maybe the problem was the time the SS was taken.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-11-2010, 11:47 PM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

Oleg has shown different types of fire for different types of fuels. Compare the FW-200, to the Ju-88s, to the Ju-87.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-12-2010, 12:16 AM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

Their are so many reasons why the "fire" in the screen shot can't be logically picked apart...

1) Comparing the ss to a real photo is imposable...if you know anything about light exposure and film you know that range of contrast becomes distorted when shooting into a bright light source.

2) You are picking apart one frame from from a moving/evolving image...How do you know that the one frame they chose to post isn't a low point between flare ups? And for that matter, I have seen real footage of burning aeroplanes where the intensity of the flames did not remain constant.

3) these ss are a WIP...nuff said.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-12-2010, 06:58 AM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

For those, who has no knowledge about WWII aircraft design, but feels himself knowledgeable enough to comment what can and what can not be in those aircraft:

There are a lots of fuel related controls and instruments in the pilot's cockpit, such as fuel cocks, fuel tank selectors, manual fuel pumps, primer pumps, fuel pressure manometers, etc. All this devices are connected to the aircraft fuel system with numerous fuel lines, which go through wings and fuselage to the cockpit. And all those lines are modeled in the collision model in the game. Any of this lines may be damaged and become the source of fuel leak and fire.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-12-2010, 07:49 AM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

How can you be sure that those systems have hit-boxes in the DM? Or are you part of the development team and know something we all don't?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-12-2010, 08:32 AM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

He's absolutely right about the way it is in real aircraft. Now, as far as the simulator goes i think he's in some way connected to the dev team, if not directly a part of it.

That of course makes me real glad to hear the explanation...if the fuel controls in the cockpit have a DM, then they probably also function just like the real ones
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.