I hate the wrong data in Il2 strmovik 1946

[Kwiatek]

Bf 109 G-2 reach in game at 6km - 650 km/h

Fw 190 D-9 (44) reach in game at 6 km - 725 km /h

How G-2 could be faster ??

If you see D-9 (44) is overspeed with 25 km/h then RL D-9.

[ZaltysZ]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

test yourslef

I don't state what I don't know. I have flown G2 and D9 more than enough over period of 3 years to know which is faster and by what magnitude.

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

test yourslef

Since your making the claim that they are not...please provide the screen shots with TAS speed indication or provide a NTRK file with the relevant speeds of both types in level flight at 6000 meters.

[KG26_Alpha]

I prefer a chart to screenshot

[DK-nme]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

I hate the erroneus data....... Why oleg put the performances so balanced avoiding the reality? Why they do that, your game is good, but with such data, not worth purchase the game, that is one of the reasons, because I regret having bought, what if I had bought real data, yesterday we played with some friends, one of They were in bf109 g2 and I in a fw190-D9, fighting to 6000 meters, the bf109 g2 was clearly faster than my fw 190 d9. Why it happens?, if you wonder if it was in a server with mods this is false, as well as tested with a TA and the same thing happened. be will avalaible some patch for correct that?, My English suck I know.

Yezzzir Ur english sucks and so does ur manners - the latter being the worst! Ur english being bad is ok and well accepted in here and which U don't have to apologize for - most of us doesn't master the english language.
But Ur anger and lack of selfcontrol that shines through this thread is an interely another matter.
Behave, be disciplined and use some selfcontrol when arguing and pointing out a reasonable problem, otherwise Ur thread will be ignored and fade away unnoticed - tackled like an outbreak of childish anger/wrath...


DK-nme

[Al Schlageter]

Ur?

try:

1) your

2) you're (you are)

[DK-nme]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

Ur?

try:

1) your

2) you're (you are)

Well YES I know that, and geez, I was just tring to use normal on-line language!!!
U, Ur and U're - YOU get the point!


DK-nme

[Skoshi Tiger]

Sturm's english is better than my anything else!

When I went to France all I had to do was try to speak in french and the locals were so horrified at what I was doing to their language that they replied in english and asked me not to speak french again!

[klem]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

Ur?

try:

1) your

2) you're (you are)

Originally Posted by DK-nme

Well YES I know that, and geez, I was just tring to use normal on-line language!!!
U, Ur and U're - YOU get the point!


DK-nme

I think the English in this thread isn't accurately modelled. I think properly used it's better than many other European languages but it does depend on the circumstances and the pilot. It's a perfect language with absolutely no flaws so it only can ever be wrong if not flown correctly.

I don't know what my English Mistress would have thought of the English in this thread. I mean the woman who taught me english not the english woman who was my mistress. Hmmm... better adjust the trim.....

God I must be bored........ waiting for SOW............

[Former_Older]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

I hate the erroneus data....... Why oleg put the performances so balanced avoiding the reality? Why they do that, your game is good, but with such data, not worth purchase the game, that is one of the reasons, because I regret having bought, what if I had bought real data, yesterday we played with some friends, one of They were in bf109 g2 and I in a fw190-D9, fighting to 6000 meters, the bf109 g2 was clearly faster than my fw 190 d9. Why it happens?, if you wonder if it was in a server with mods this is false, as well as tested with a TA and the same thing happened. be will avalaible some patch for correct that?, My English suck I know.

Couple of observations:

6000m. Are you sure that the modeling of high altitude, not the aircraft, is the issue?

You seem to assume that both aircraft were being flown correctly

Also, have you ever considered that any simulation has limitations? Buying "real data" seems to be your solution. Where is this "real data" warehouse? It is very easy to point out failings in anything, the challenge is to find the faults and the ways to correct them, or different approaches to solve the problems. You do neither. You complain, proclaim things as wrong as if you know everything and can decide what's right and wrong, and then offer nothing but a request for a fix

To create a 'perfect' simulation of anything, first a "perfect" simulation of the real world needs to be modeled. Only then can a proper simulation of anything be produced. This simulation, despite it's improvements, is eight years old. The developer cannot be expected to provide support and improvements to the product forever. Do you understand that? The developer has ceased support of this simulation because they are developing a better one. The intention is to provide a more perfect simulation- but not by improving this one. You cannot just 'buy better data', plug it into the sim, and make the sim better.

Your complaints may be very valid, but you are literally years late in voicing them