Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:26 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

From what I heard the Gripen and our F18 will share the same engine, obviously the F18 get a F414 upgrade in the near future(?).

Furthermore buying new F18 is going to be an adventure, the Swiss F18 are made in Switzerland with crapload of swiss-custom parts, they replaced everything with titanium.
I mean, that thing is tough enough for carrier operations, but not tough enough for the Swiss? Ok...

Twin engine also means double fuel consumption and double maintenance - sorry, there's no cash for this kind of luxury.

Concerning the future: We are considering to switch to only one model - the Gripen.

And the F35, well, that thing is joke.
"Let the missiles do the turning", lol
What if they fail?
You can't run
You can't outturn your enemy


Check out this link
http://www.ausairpower.net/jsf.html

Last edited by swiss; 12-01-2011 at 01:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:37 PM
BGs_Ricky BGs_Ricky is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 139
Default

I for one will be happy to see them flying here in a few years...granted the people vote yes, and that's not sure yet. I know so many people around me that would drop our army if they could, that I think it will be a tough votation, the last one for the F-18 made 57% of yes, now in a time of crisis many people just see what they consider an unnecessary 3 billions public money spending.

We'll see...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:44 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
From what I heard the Gripen and our F18 will share the same engine, obviously the F18 get a F414 upgrade in the near future(?).

Furthermore buying new F18 is going to be an adventure, the Swiss F18 are made in Switzerland with crapload of swiss-custom parts, they replaced everything with titanium.
I mean, that thing is tough enough for carrier operations, but not tough enough for the Swiss? Ok...

Twin engine also means double fuel consumption and double maintenance - sorry, there's no cash for this kind of luxury.

Concerning the future: We are considering to switch to only one model - the Gripen.

And the F35, well, that thing is joke.
"Let the missiles do the turning", lol
What if they fail?
You can't run
You can't outturn your enemy


Check out this link
http://www.ausairpower.net/jsf.html
anyway, i belive in some few decades we will see not few airarms flying only the F-35 as manned jets.......
the tactical thinking , at least in europe,cwent away from full scale airwar to a tatical one were you throw smart bombs form medium height on some 'tribes' . if this will still fit in 50 years, nobody can say.

running a serious airforce is a very expensiv affair nowadays.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:56 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Considering the size of Switzerland, I wonder why they don't invest in a decent AA missile system really. I mean, seriously, how do they operate with these jets? Flying around in circles all the time?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2011, 01:59 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
Considering the size of Switzerland, I wonder why they don't invest in a decent AA missile system really. I mean, seriously, how do they operate with these jets? Flying around in circles all the time?
Because you can't police your airspace with missiles.
Well, you could, but... lol
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:11 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

"shoot first, ask later"


i my opinion, its most times better to build a Air-to-Air jet and give this Air-to-Ground ability than otherway round. It might be more expensive, yes, but you are more safe whatever you need in the future.....
In this part, it will be interesting to see how the F-35 will perform once in service for some time....
i think if a flightbof F-35 will ever meet a flight of Su-35/30 in anger, and no of the so few F-22 will cover them (what will the USN do..?) , i hope for the F-35 pilots they had very good training.

for throwing smart bombs on the mentioned 'tribes' a Pilatus or Embraer turboprop with the needed avionics is good enough, and a lot cheaper (i guess)



for switzerland, i also think its futre will be the Gripen ( if it will make it through,).perhaps order some more than 22. i belive it will be the last manned jet to be purchased by switzerland......

Last edited by JG53Frankyboy; 12-01-2011 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-01-2011, 02:38 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
From what I heard the Gripen and our F18 will share the same engine, obviously the F18 get a F414 upgrade in the near future(?).

They hve not the same spool size if I remind well. But I guess many chore parts are compatible.

In 2020 for sure it wld be a 35 unless the dumbknopf ru[i]ning the fighters project in EU start to re-think their strategy
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-02-2011, 12:53 PM
JG4_Helofly JG4_Helofly is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 141
Default

The problem is that in switzerland there is almost no discussion about the threats we are likely to face. I got the impression that the new planes are only some new expensive toys for the military, but no one asks for what tasks we really need them.
Yes, we need an army, but an army which is adequate for the situation. Even if we would expect only one of our neighbors to attack us (which is extremely unlikely), then 22 brand new EF or rafale wouldn't make a difference. For every other scenario we don't need these expensive jets either.
That's why the Saab is a good choice.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-02-2011, 01:25 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOZR View Post
Bhaa Ain't a Rafale..
Is Dassault arrogant?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7MG3J320111116
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-02-2011, 01:26 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Yeah, I don't really think you need jets at all frankly. Again, an efficient AA network is way more effective and less costly on such a small territory than anything else.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.