Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY - For 4.11

[_RAAF_Furball]

Originally Posted by csThor

Fenrir, Smouch ... Thx. Will modify the incorrect codes and add No 1 Sqn RAAF.

(as US-x)

You beauty - thank you !

[Stealth_Eagle]

Originally Posted by JAMF

It's one of those bits in the game that are from the manufacturer which took legal action against Pacific Fighters, so it's not likely to be in an official patch.

Why would they do that?
It actually helps the company.

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Explain it to them.

[JAMF]

Originally Posted by Stealth_Eagle

Why would they do that?
It actually helps the company.

One of those "overeager legal departments" / "because we can" things and Ubi not using their legal department for the preventive side of things.

[Stealth_Eagle]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

Explain it to them.

Which company do I need to contact? I will see what stings I can pull to help you. How about my request? I just prefer the things that don't get as much attention but will dramatically improve gaming experience. Do you think you can make some early gen spitfires so I can create a Battle of Britain map for a server that I am part of so the people with PC's that can't handle cliffs of Dover at the moment can have a stand in until they upgrade their computers to get the full effect of the Battle of Britain in Cliffs of Dover. Please and thank you.

[iMattheush]

So, what about Polish PZL's ?

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Stealth Eagle... this is very old knowledge, but I see you are new here (welcome!), so I will explain: Our team has signed a contract with 1C to be able do what we do. Part of that contract are among other things following restrictions:

1. No implementing of things, that is owned in reallife by Northrop-Grumman (this is the place to go to, if you think you can help us - I hope you are a billionaire!)
2. No implementing of content, that may thematically interfer with the future plans of 1C, regarding their new flight sim - which excludes explicitly any Battle Of Britain content.

This is all a very fact and nothing can be done against it (especially not from our side).

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

Originally Posted by iMattheush

So, what about Polish PZL's ?

Nice idea (like any of the missing planes). But no plans from our side regarding these yet.

[28_Condor]

S!

Well, I did a search and I didint anythig about V-1s, then I will repeat my question here:

It is possible to make V-1s a target creating a entry into the eventlog when a rocket is destroyed?

In a older version destroying a V-1 that event was count as a AA object destroyed, but in later patchs no more

In greatergreen.com I asked about this subject a time ago:

http://www.greatergreen.com/forum/index.php?topic=35.0

Sorry, if my English is not intelligible

Cheers!

[Stealth_Eagle]

Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar

Stealth Eagle... this is very old knowledge, but I see you are new here (welcome!), so I will explain: Our team has signed a contract with 1C to be able do what we do. Part of that contract are among other things following restrictions:

1. No implementing of things, that is owned in reallife by Northrop-Grumman (this is the place to go to, if you think you can help us - I hope you are a billionaire!)
2. No implementing of content, that may thematically interfer with the future plans of 1C, regarding their new flight sim - which excludes explicitly any Battle Of Britain content.

This is all a very fact and nothing can be done against it (especially not from our side).

I am contacting Northtop Grumman and see if I can get this for your rights for it. Wish me luck.

Message has been sent and I have a copy of the message if needed.