New expansion - Ice and Fire

[Anti-global]

As everybody said, this is just copy-paste disappointment. But I am not gonna lie, I haven't bought a single game in my life. I simply have no money to spend on virtual things.
But, if 1C Company managed to make NEW Kings Bounty that would be as good as The Armoured Princess (completly new world, and so on) and that would be cross-platform (would work on Linux natively), I would definitely buy it.

[Elwin]

Coming as a pirate and reaveling it on official forum?

[Anti-global]

At least I'm honest. They can Ban me, if they want...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ban_%28title%29

[Zhuangzi]

I bought KB Legend once, Armored Princess twice, Crossworlds once and Warriors of the North once. The only disappointment in there was WoTN and I still played 90 hours of it, so it wasn't the worst thing ever. However, I'm really not sure whether I'll be buying the new DLC if I have to start a new WoTN campaign to play it, which I suspect will be the case. The developers should have learned by now that LONG, GRINDING campaigns (TL, WoTN) are not as much fun as medium sized ones (AP, Orcs of the Marsh, other Crossworlds campaigns). KB had the best turn based strategy I ever played, pretty much, but it could get tedious eventually. 290 or so fights in AP was plenty. So why do I want an extra long WoTN campaign that will probably take 100 hours to grind my way through?

[Csimbi]

Originally Posted by Zhuangzi

I bought KB Legend once, Armored Princess twice, Crossworlds once and Warriors of the North once. The only disappointment in there was WoTN and I still played 90 hours of it, so it wasn't the worst thing ever. However, I'm really not sure whether I'll be buying the new DLC if I have to start a new WoTN campaign to play it, which I suspect will be the case. The developers should have learned by now that LONG, GRINDING campaigns (TL, WoTN) are not as much fun as medium sized ones (AP, Orcs of the Marsh, other Crossworlds campaigns). KB had the best turn based strategy I ever played, pretty much, but it could get tedious eventually. 290 or so fights in AP was plenty. So why do I want an extra long WoTN campaign that will probably take 100 hours to grind my way through?

Meh, I like and I want my campaign long. The only problem I have is that it's the same maps all over again...

[Anti-global]

Originally Posted by Csimbi

Meh, I like and I want my campaign long. The only problem I have is that it's the same maps all over again...

Exactly.

[Darkeonz]

The saddest thing is I hunger for new King's Bounty material, but I simply cannot play warriors of the north one more time. I was bored out of my mind. So I might just check out the new units on youtube.

[Csimbi]

Originally Posted by Darkeonz

The saddest thing is I hunger for new King's Bounty material, but I simply cannot play warriors of the north one more time. I was bored out of my mind. So I might just check out the new units on youtube.

+1

[Zhuangzi]

Okay, so $9 on steam is pretty cheap, so I'm considering it, but will I have to start and play through a new WoTN campaign to access the new stuff? Cos I'd be happy not to have to do all that again...

[ckdamascus]

Originally Posted by Zhuangzi

Okay, so $9 on steam is pretty cheap, so I'm considering it, but will I have to start and play through a new WoTN campaign to access the new stuff? Cos I'd be happy not to have to do all that again...

Let me know if it isn't as buggy or if it is improved. A part of me wants to hit the button and become a tester again... another part of me says "don't fall for it".