FPS comparison 15950 - 17582Hotfix - 18301

[NervousEnergy]

Have you tried backing off 'Original' for texture quality? You've got a 1 GB card, and IIRC the Original, uncompressed textures would really strain that and cause lots of extra stutters and pauses as textures swapped in and out of VRAM.

I can't see any difference between Original and High, but the latter uses a lot less memory on the card.

[Dano]

Originally Posted by NervousEnergy

Have you tried backing off 'Original' for texture quality? You've got a 1 GB card, and IIRC the Original, uncompressed textures would really strain that and cause lots of extra stutters and pauses as textures swapped in and out of VRAM.

I can't see any difference between Original and High, but the latter uses a lot less memory on the card.

I think you've misunderstood the reason for the benchmark.

[E.F.Hartmann]

Hello all,
I have a Nvidia 460 GTX and I turn that has 30fps moin see it just does it on my card or the patch?.
Is that somebody who has the same than I could compare with his?.
Thank you in advance for your reply.

[justme262]

Two steps forward... Three steps backward

It runs slower with more stutters AND there is no trees!! NO TREES WTF

Tracers are awesome though ... maybe little too awesome. But they are an improvement.

Back to Rise of Flight wake me when the next patch is out...

[vranac]

Originally Posted by NervousEnergy

Have you tried backing off 'Original' for texture quality? You've got a 1 GB card, and IIRC the Original, uncompressed textures would really strain that and cause lots of extra stutters and pauses as textures swapped in and out of VRAM.

I can't see any difference between Original and High, but the latter uses a lot less memory on the card.

No need to put textures down with 560 Ti 1GB, I'm using "original" online no stutters or pauses.
Sim uses 800-9x0 MB VRAM at 1680 res., at least in this beta.