![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I only want a more realistic way of spotting enemies under or above your plane.
It's really frustrating not seeing a contact 500m under your plane because of forest but still you can see enemies 4km above because they are big black dots: like inferior camo was useless. Usually planes were visible because of sun reflections or exhaust emissions, and on night because of the red hot exhaust tubes. I'm so pissed off by those single grey discs on your six (yes I'm talking about spitfires' propellers... the only thing I see together with the flames from the side of the disc, that are her cannons when she fires)
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nobody, as yet, seems to have worked out how to simulate the human eye.
I think visual cues as already mentioned would be good, a quick flash of reflected light or a slight flicker of movement down low would be good. And when is somebody going to introduce a padlock view that only keeps lock on as long as you have line of sight from the cockpit (apologies if someone already has) whatever view you use. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Winny, IL2 Does. if the padlocked a/c disapears for a couple of seconds behind a cocpit bar or somewhere else it gets unlocked.
cheers Schallmoser |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds realistic to me
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think an adjustment to "icons" for those that use them is certainly in order.
However, more impotantly for me, would be a huge improvement to "dots" and LOD's(which was mentioned earlier) since I prefer to fly with no icons. I think improving the changeover from Dots to LOD's is the key and it needs to be self scaling depending on the resolution you are using. I currently have to fly in 720P on a 1080P monitor so I can see dots correctly and long distances because of the way they are currently moddeled at low res. We shouldn't have to do that with todays technology and high resolutions. My 2 cents... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am new to il2, 6 months now and i have not used icons, ever, it is a killer of realism to me. I do however use my map when i have to and every view that i can to help spot enemy. I know not so real either but not so bad as icons in the sky killing the mood.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Another aid with target identification would e a button that when pressed would prompt your (obviously all seeing) AI wingman to report the position of the enemy- as coordinates on a map ( eg " enemy in square Q-10"), an also its relative position (eg 3 o'clock - like its currently implemented in IL2) and its altitude. The main point is for this to happen ON DEMAND from a player eg at a press of a button, or at least to have that option. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uhmm, interesting. Maybe, just as an idea, a good option would be that you have to press a key to see the icons, and keep it pressed to keep the icons on. When you release the key the icons fade away. This way its a momentary trade off you give to the beginner to know which aircraft is which, and the distance.
And also may help the newbies to start to learn by the size of the plane the distance of the aircraft. Beside that, it should be configurable like in IL-2 if you want color to give a diference between friend or foe, ro want to see all icons on the same color making necesary learn the aircraft designation to know if enemy or friendly. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also agree that the option to press a buttyton for momentarilly icons (and limited to a certain "cone" maybe), is the best compormise. You have inmersion all of the time but the information you might want (or need) at the touch of a button....
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I am thinking of my current stock campaign in the Crimea and many missions are flown over friendly territory or close to the line of battle. It would be realistic to assume that reports could get to the pilot about enemy planes being spotted. Maybe the information is old, maybe it is incomplete or inaccurate at times, but having it there would be a blast. Splitter |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|