Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:21 PM
Fritz X Fritz X is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 59
Default

@ Stukadriver:

Quote:
Originally Posted by robday View Post
If you have installed Il2 1946 you will have V4.07m. You need to download and install V4.08m, V4.09m, V4.10m and V4.10.1m. You need to install them on top of each-other in numerical order. The Mission4Today site has them all. Get them, install them and enjoy!
I almost forgot that there is also an optional skin pack for 4.09m which adds more paint schemes for your 'planes.
Pretty much this.

In case you should have bought 1946 on Steam, the game will already be upgraded to V4.09m, including the skin pack (it's not optional on Steam, but installed automatically). So if you run this game through Steam, you only have to download V4.10m and V4.101m and install them manually.

Last edited by Fritz X; 04-07-2011 at 10:23 PM.
  #102  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:42 PM
Ace1staller Ace1staller is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: somewhere in the united states
Posts: 125
Default

It would be nice to add the P-26 peashooter with out mods and I would also like the P-60 to be in the game. Also There is a CAC boomerang airplane (its austrailian airplane). Why is these planes not in, it would be a good time to put these planes in the game.
  #103  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:48 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace1staller View Post
It would be nice to add the P-26 peashooter with out mods and I would also like the P-60 to be in the game. Also There is a CAC boomerang airplane (its austrailian airplane). Why is these planes not in, it would be a good time to put these planes in the game.
Not saying that this is the case for any of these aircraft but some MOD aircraft are not built to specifications. Some are missing some or all levels of detail (LODs), have too many polys, or other problems that cause problems. It's fine for a MOD... MODs are a great way to experiment and put content in without worrying too much about finishing things off until ready. But to go in a official patch... the details need to be finished too.

There's a lot of behind the scenes effort that goes into making these things. Huge respect for everyone involved in making a cockpit or a external mesh or laying out the skin.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #104  
Old 04-08-2011, 03:33 AM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar View Post
Main and most important features of ZUTI's MDS are already in 4.10. Where have you been?
Parts of it, that didn't work well, were left out for probably being fixed and included later, such as RRR and multicrew.
Nice... and great update guys... Wow.. it blows my mind.. Remember when we used to use Pe-8s as simulated B-17s..? This thing has so so far exceeded the money I paid for every add on as far as bang for the buck.. I spent almost $3500 at Disney World (including getting there hotels gas gifts etc... ) one year... and it is a distant memory.
  #105  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:32 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NNFFL=YLB= View Post
The team Daidalos will make a B-26 Marauder?
I'm not a member of TD, but my guess is no, since it was the MARTIN B-26 Marauder. These days Martin is part of the evil Lockheed/Martin Northrop/Grumman defense megacorp that smacked down 1C/Ubi over bogus intellectual property claims a few years back.

Since TD must abide by the terms of the same agreement that 1C/Ubi signed to get Lockheed/Martin/Northrop/Grumman off their backs, basically just about all WW2-era U.S. aircraft and ships are off limits.
  #106  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:37 PM
TinyTim TinyTim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
I'm not a member of TD, but my guess is no, since it was the MARTIN B-26 Marauder. These days Martin is part of the evil Lockheed/Martin Northrop/Grumman defense megacorp that smacked down 1C/Ubi over bogus intellectual property claims a few years back.

Since TD must abide by the terms of the same agreement that 1C/Ubi signed to get Lockheed/Martin/Northrop/Grumman off their backs, basically just about all WW2-era U.S. aircraft and ships are off limits.
... but a free addon/patch is not making any money... and as far as I know making money with these models is what's the problem.
  #107  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:37 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oso1983 View Post
please add the Bombs Away command in this patch..... please so it is realy posible to level bomb in formation, leading ai aircraft
There is already a mod which allows you to do this and also allows you to manage aircraft formations of up to wing size (ca. 100 aircraft).

Personally, I'd love it if that mod, or something like it, made it into an official patch.
  #108  
Old 04-08-2011, 04:55 PM
Letum Letum is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
There is already a mod which allows you to do this and also allows you to manage aircraft formations of up to wing size (ca. 100 aircraft).

Personally, I'd love it if that mod, or something like it, made it into an official patch.
Same here.
I would make singleplayer bomber missions WORK!
  #109  
Old 04-08-2011, 05:06 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TinyTim View Post
... but a free addon/patch is not making any money... and as far as I know making money with these models is what's the problem.
Technically, by offering new content which might increase sales of IL2, TD is making money for 1C. In any case, I believe that the TD members had to agree to work under the same restrictions as the 1C team.

Of course, now that I've gone and posted, it looks like Lockheed-Martin is still its own corporation, although they tried to merge with N-G about a decade ago when things were better for the world and not so good for weapon makers.

I think the real impact of the N-G affair was to make Oleg and company very wary of modeling any U.S. weapon system. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for any U.S. plane unless it's produced by a company that's been gone for at least 50 years. That still leaves a whole lot of Brewster, Curtiss, Stinson and Waco products which are fair game.
  #110  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:57 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Helldiver, P40-N, and Hawk 75s FTW.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.