Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Other > Other Topics

Other Topics Feel free to discuss other topics here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:10 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
If you fail to see the technological advancements that's being utilized in the product you're nothing but a failure to yourself.
lol you cant even think rationally

the low level aerial view and ground level views look pretty crappy, it is empty and bland. do we have to light a few joints and get in a special mood to see something revolutionary there ? its flat, empty, lifeless and boring with a few of the old dated il2 trees


Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
You're the one bashing the product before it's even released and making false accusations while trying to spread the word about "OH the almighy Neoqb is coming to fool us with a product worse than IL2 only to piss people off and let's wait for the SAINT Storm of War instead people".
what is a bit odd is that you keep being the one that turns up here and hypes this over rated crap here, maybe you got lost somewhere with all that complex clickedy-click you have to do in a browser to navigate the web, but you landed in an il2/BoB forum here

Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
And if RoF is a hyped product what isn't BoB then?
You claim me to be the fanboy while you're worshiping oleg confident of how it's already gonna be a 10x leap over RoF and all the others sims out there without even seeing a SINGLE game play video of it and rarly hearing any information at all.
your having another brain fart, got lost in where you are again ?

lemme help you out, yeps your again in an il2/BoB forum ! and guess what, thats where people get their updates on BoB and discuss it, not every other flying turd that grabs the short attention span of your limited brain power. want to discuss flying turds, go to the turd forum, you've even been warned by the moderators here before

and since you seem to know so little about il2/BoB, the 1946 addon cd already had ingame video from BoB, or did the pirated copy you downloaded not include the 2 cd ? ooops, catch you out there with your trousers down did we ?


Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
I've yet to see the fake 3d models you're on about however there is no secret that in a flight simulation you've to make sacrifices in favor for performance. Seriously you can't draw over 500.000 trees that are true 100% detailed 3d models and expect to run it on a high end machine today...
there you go again, blabbering on as if you know something profound about gaming without having a clue, and just making a string of excuses for what looks like a pretty crappy game. of course if you use 5000 of oleg's old tree types in RoF will you need a quad cray with liquid nitrogen cooling, but that the point now isnt it ? just go and refresh your mind at how stunning some of olegs new trees look compared to the old il2 ones, and hey guess what, you'll have heaps of them to running on a modern pc.

and btw, even the free new scenery maps for the il2 mods look heaps better than RoF imo, just have a little search for Canon's UK maps, and the new BoB maps being made for which screenshots have been posted on the main il2 forums in the last months.


Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
I am sure that if it was possible in terms of time, money and system requirements the ROF team would love to have Crysis graphics on the ground for all entities and units just as much as the Crysis team would love to have insane flight aerodynamics and a world gameplay map as large as the one in RoF, but you see they're two different games focusing entirely on their own agenda not world domination and perfection in every corner.
and there my little internet troll you have stepped right in the poop again

because if you look at oleg's work in progress, thats exactly what a next level new flightsim should take us, and by oleg reports of progress that is exactly what he is aiming for. the ground objects and planes look absolutely stunning in detail, so good in fact many of us are speculating it might incorporate a 1e person shooter environment at some point.

add to that online-offline play, dynamic campaigns, a reputable product from a designer with a good track record, well you get my drift, it's gonna be a hoot and no hype needed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:36 PM
virre89 virre89 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
lol you cant even think rationally

the low level aerial view and ground level views look pretty crappy, it is empty and bland. do we have to light a few joints and get in a special mood to see something revolutionary there ? its flat, empty, lifeless and boring with a few of the old dated il2 trees




what is a bit odd is that you keep being the one that turns up here and hypes this over rated crap here, maybe you got lost somewhere with all that complex clickedy-click you have to do in a browser to navigate the web, but you landed in an il2/BoB forum here



your having another brain fart, got lost in where you are again ?

lemme help you out, yeps your again in an il2/BoB forum ! and guess what, thats where people get their updates on BoB and discuss it, not every other flying turd that grabs the short attention span of your limited brain power. want to discuss flying turds, go to the turd forum, you've even been warned by the moderators here before

and since you seem to know so little about il2/BoB, the 1946 addon cd already had ingame video from BoB, or did the pirated copy you downloaded not include the 2 cd ? ooops, catch you out there with your trousers down did we ?




there you go again, blabbering on as if you know something profound about gaming without having a clue, and just making a string of excuses for what looks like a pretty crappy game. of course if you use 5000 of oleg's old tree types in RoF will you need a quad cray with liquid nitrogen cooling, but that the point now isnt it ? just go and refresh your mind at how stunning some of olegs new trees look compared to the old il2 ones, and hey guess what, you'll have heaps of them to running on a modern pc.

and btw, even the free new scenery maps for the il2 mods look heaps better than RoF imo, just have a little search for Canon's UK maps, and the new BoB maps being made for which screenshots have been posted on the main il2 forums in the last months.




and there my little internet troll you have stepped right in the poop again

because if you look at oleg's work in progress, thats exactly what a next level new flightsim should take us, and by oleg reports of progress that is exactly what he is aiming for. the ground objects and planes look absolutely stunning in detail, so good in fact many of us are speculating it might incorporate a 1e person shooter environment at some point.

add to that online-offline play, dynamic campaigns, a reputable product from a designer with a good track record, well you get my drift, it's gonna be a hoot and no hype needed.
Well my friend you just proved to yourself and everyone around here that your an immature little kid just looking for a fight, pm me if you've some real answers to my posts above instead of pathetically trying to insult me in every single one of you're replies. It's entertaining to see you try tho , I'll guess i'll go make some popcorn as well

The board is IL2 it's not even about SoW , but hey whatever right, the topic is about RoF stick to it.
I don't know but maybe you think that everyone who stands by RoF or buys it will hate SoW or does hate SoW and IL2?
Been playing il2 for as long as i can remember and the same goes for looking forward to BoB, now i can't say that i am disappointed when another quality sim of the same level pops up and takes us back to ww1 aviation..

And for the record i do own the 1946 DVD
(2 and half year old video mate, and i can't say that it's looking stunning judging by that ) *caught fanboy*

Last but not least pm me your sources of a buggy / dead environment of RoF and include the Fake 3d models , I'd love to see them you know

Last edited by virre89; 04-26-2009 at 05:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2009, 07:38 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Thumbs down

zzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzz
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2009, 08:55 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
Well my friend .... ... ... ., I'd love to see them you know
and, thats it ? nothing more interesting to say ?

you'r even pretty pathetic as a troll

just had a read of a review on a blog from a beta tester (the rock paper shotgun site), if its correct what he said you only get 2 flyable planes with the game !! lol, your dad is gonna love you when you come every 2 weeks to him for another 50$ for the next new aircraft released that you have to buy. for those of us living in real life the whole scheme seems idiotic and poorly thought out.

and now i have a riddle for those intending to buy RoF, do you think the newer planes they will have on sale later will be better/worse, faster/slower, bigger/smaller guns, etc then the stock 2 you get with the initial game you buy ? i guess we all know the answer already, unless you keep buying whatever new crap they they keep releasing you wont be competitive online.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2009, 09:43 AM
Bobb4 Bobb4 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
now i have a riddle for those intending to buy RoF, do you think the newer planes they will have on sale later will be better/worse, faster/slower, bigger/smaller guns, etc then the stock 2 you get with the initial game you buy ? i guess we all know the answer already, unless you keep buying whatever new crap they they keep releasing you wont be competitive online.
I have had a guy blow me out of the sky flying a P11, after that I stopped worrying about Uber planes I worry more about the skills of the pilot.
A good pilot will fly rings around a bad pilot in a good plane...
To extend your argument you would need to add ping, lag, screen resolution and frame rate into the equation. Hell if I wanted fair I would fly against the AI only

Last edited by Bobb4; 04-27-2009 at 09:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2009, 02:36 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobb4 View Post
I have had a guy blow me out of the sky flying a P11, after that I stopped worrying about Uber planes I worry more about the skills of the pilot.
A good pilot will fly rings around a bad pilot in a good plane...
To extend your argument you would need to add ping, lag, screen resolution and frame rate into the equation. Hell if I wanted fair I would fly against the AI only
maybe true in some cases where the better pilot with an inferior machine can gain the upper hand, but all things being equal the "better" plane has an advantage, otherwise you would have citroen 2CV's participating in F1 racing

as i am sure you understood, the point is that if the better planes in RoF will only be allocated to those that keep spending the most money then there is a serious problem in the way it is designed. but i suspect by its creators its just seen as a "feature" added to increase the money they can squeeze from their ever dwindling customer base.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2009, 04:06 PM
virre89 virre89 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
and, thats it ? nothing more interesting to say ?

you'r even pretty pathetic as a troll

just had a read of a review on a blog from a beta tester (the rock paper shotgun site), if its correct what he said you only get 2 flyable planes with the game !! lol, your dad is gonna love you when you come every 2 weeks to him for another 50$ for the next new aircraft released that you have to buy. for those of us living in real life the whole scheme seems idiotic and poorly thought out.

and now i have a riddle for those intending to buy RoF, do you think the newer planes they will have on sale later will be better/worse, faster/slower, bigger/smaller guns, etc then the stock 2 you get with the initial game you buy ? i guess we all know the answer already, unless you keep buying whatever new crap they they keep releasing you wont be competitive online.
What an empty argument, still awaiting your sources for your previous arguments roffel.
It's just obvious your spitting shit out of your mouth and all around you just to harass everyone that buys RoF since it doesn't fit your imaginary game of the year, seriously let us pay for it and don't worry about us, I'll tell you after initial release how much of a "waste" it was to pay 50$ on this game.

I'll quote a SIMHQ Admin on this because he said it so well;
Quote:
cs Thor, the problem isn't people who have reservations in general. Most of us have reservations in general about this system that NeoQb has put into place.

What is bothersome are the individuals that are what I call 'one trick ponies'. YOu know the types. These are guys that will enter a thread called, 'New ROF pics' and will immediately start hammering on the devs for the softward check system or whatever. When told that they should knock it off they then scream about how important it is that everyone know what kind of meenies this company or that company is because they mandate some kind of software system and so on and so on.

We've seen this plainly with SF in the past. I know, say Starforce three times and the beast will rise again but it is a perfect example of how any thread was ruined by self appointed messengers who felt that any thread had to have at least ten references to the evil, horrendous Starforce (that's two) so consumers would be able to make an 'intelligent' decision. Of course that decision had to be one that the messenger felt was appropriate.

It is fine you have pricipals but when people start interjecting their personal agendas into every thread then it goes beyond having your principal to trying to impose your beliefs on others. If no one can discuss one aspect of a game without another person shoving another aspect in their face then there will be no discussion at all.

I still think that the best way to discuss things like DRM (which the sign in every time to play the game really is) is to have a forum about it. We put a big sign at the top of the forum to direct people with curiousities about that forum. All we ask is that the people there be members of SimHq and sign in. However there are bunches of folks that consider this small request to be some kind of great burden on humanity and another big fight starts after that.

Sorry but after day after day of reading this stuff, followed by constant arguments that we are somehow suppressing the information because we want people to be actual members of SimHq to read the DRM arguments and we get a little bit tainted and irritated, and we start to become sarcastic.

I wish people would become this exercised and involved with their own countries problems instead of jumping on the white horse over a 45 dollar video game. Maybe some of the world's problems wouldn't be so bad.
You fit the description 99,9 %.

Besides you're going personal about this.. involving my dad and friends as a way to insult me, seriously dude it's way to obvious that you don't have a clue of what you're talking about.

I'd say a ban of you would soon be in place..

Last edited by virre89; 04-27-2009 at 04:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2009, 05:49 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
just to harass everyone that buys RoF since it doesn't fit your imaginary game of the year, seriously let us pay for it and don't worry about us, I'll tell you after initial release how much of a "waste" it was to pay 50$ on this game.
you really cant think rationally, can you ?

go and get all exited with your bestest friends at the RoF forums and swap spit there, nobody from the il2/BoB forums will come and bother you there, just dont come and promote that junk in the il2/BoB forum and expect people to look uncritically at whatever latest toy you get all exited over

Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
I'll quote a SIMHQ Admin on this because he said it so well;
learn how to think for yourself if you ever want to understand how the world functions, and maybe start by not blindly quoting things you dont understand

simhq is a commercial venture, and nowadays is a website and forum that is run to make money (it wasnt at its inception, but was later sold by its original creator), and by the looks of that admin post there is a large volume of negative comments on RoF in their forums and simhq is now worried it risks reducing the revenue they can make from RoF game/retail advertisers. if anything their statement is an indication of censorship and how they try to contain negative posts by blocking discussion on this issue (seems most people that intended to, now wont buy the game), in past instances simhq were able to walk the fine line without using censorship and i thought they managed controversial issues fairly well, this time they havnt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by virre89 View Post
Besides you're going personal about this..
you poor thing, are those nasty people on the internet being rude to you for no reason ? i'll give you a hint, but you'r going to have to start figuring some of your life out yourself because there wont always be nice people like myself to help you out

just re-read your own recent one sided fanboy type posts promoting RoF in the il2/BoB forum here from the beginning, and you should be able to easily notice how rude and obnoxious you are to other posters who dislike RoF for various reasons. you'r a crybaby for thinking you can be rude to other and then whine when you get a decent serve in return. wake up and realize the world is full of people that have different opinions to yours and they will voice them to. simply learn to coexist with them in a civilized fashion, and i suspect that they will then probably leave you alone to

Last edited by zapatista; 04-28-2009 at 05:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2009, 06:40 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

going by some other posts i have been reading, it seems that right from the start of the RoF game being sold they will have "addon" planes for sale (seen at the wings of honor website)

so from what i can make out so far, you get only 2 planes for your first 50$ (the list price is 35 euro), and you then need to spend another 50$ for the next plane from the same people that just sold you the game (havnt seen a specific price for those yet), etc...

the more i hear about this, the worst it gets, they are selling you an incomplete game from the start
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2009, 04:53 PM
virre89 virre89 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 185
Default

Seriously Zapatista you're the most stupid n incompetent person on these boards that I've ever come across, i remember you whining in old threads as well trying and trying so hard to prove your point while no one gives a **** about your fantasy arguments that you make up without having any reliable basis for what you're saying. Black Shark contains only one aircraft still I amongst many fans bought it , quantity doesn't equal quality now IL2 might have 50+ planes but compared to i.e how Black Shark simulates the KA50 non of the Aircrafts comes close. (Black shark is for instance the most realistic simulator on the market at the moment)

It's all about quality but sure you don't see that, it's not an incomplete game but if that's what you wanna call it whatever then..

You know what, we don't care and we won't miss you.

Last edited by virre89; 04-28-2009 at 04:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.