Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2013, 03:50 AM
MaxGunz MaxGunz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 471
Default

Something like that except that mask being an AND operation, the ACE masks would mask out of the last 8 bits; 0xFD, 0xFE, 0xFA, while the rookie might be 0xE8, 0xF0 kind of thing. These would be applied to the mantissa part of the FP value already being used for aim.

It's the kind of thing that has to be tried to find out what works.
  #2  
Old 08-28-2013, 01:57 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

A simple random roll could be used to adjust the aim, or dispersion.
rookie=1 100% roll
average=2 100% rolls divided by two
veteran=3 100% rolls divided by 3
ace=4 100% rolls divided by 4.

When you superpose rolls, you create a bell like curve of probability, with a higher probability in the center of the curve. Make this values the target ones, and you got a nicely adjusted AI, that still could miss.

More the rolls, higher the accuracy.

Still, I don't know how taxing it will be to generate s many random numbers while firing.
  #3  
Old 08-28-2013, 02:03 PM
MaxGunz MaxGunz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 471
Default

More math/operations, slower FPS.
  #4  
Old 08-30-2013, 10:59 AM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxGunz View Post
More math/operations, slower FPS.
True, but right now with 16 B17 flying and with gunners firing, my CPU 3 and 4 nucleus are below 20% usage. (it's an old phenom II X4 955)
  #5  
Old 08-30-2013, 02:16 PM
MaxGunz MaxGunz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 471
Default

Thanks for caring about the rest of us running single core CPU's at less than 3 GHz.
  #6  
Old 08-30-2013, 08:08 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxGunz View Post
Thanks for caring about the rest of us running single core CPU's at less than 3 GHz.
Hrrmpf! Time for an upgrade, don't you think?
  #7  
Old 08-30-2013, 09:01 PM
MaxGunz MaxGunz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 471
Default

I planted a dollar in the back yard (lottery ticket costs $2 so figure...) but the damned money bush hasn't even sprouted yet!

So unless you're deaf to sarcasm?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.