Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2013, 06:07 AM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

Don't want to start a fight, but this is not your territory either. Stop being sounding like a host. Actually I was here 4 years before you came. Just sit and watch, mate.
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-18-2013, 07:10 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

The flight models never were more realistic than they are now. In Il-2 early days, AI occasionally swapped the plane around and continued chasing you tail first. Quite a sight. Unfortunately I can't find a youtube video.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-18-2013, 09:11 AM
Luno13 Luno13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 370
Default

You mean, like, flying backwards? Whoa man, I'm trippin' out.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-18-2013, 10:10 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luno13 View Post
You mean, like, flying backwards? Whoa man, I'm trippin' out.
Yes, exactly. It was a rare thing to happen, but happened.

Generally it was easier flying backwards, pulling up vertical and then start a tailslide. I managed to go under a bridge, turn the plane around and continue flying that way, as well as several backwards landings.

Good old days, was a lot of fun. But certainly not realistic.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-18-2013, 11:48 AM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

There used to be a vid showing an i16 flying under a bridge, pulling up vertical until it stalled without any wingdip and then flying backwards under the bridge and -300kph.

Anyone who thinks that the fms have been dumbed down and are less realistic now, is on the crack pipe.

Last edited by fruitbat; 02-18-2013 at 01:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2013, 12:39 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
Yes, exactly. It was a rare thing to happen, but happened.

Generally it was easier flying backwards, pulling up vertical and then start a tailslide. I managed to go under a bridge, turn the plane around and continue flying that way, as well as several backwards landings.

Good old days, was a lot of fun. But certainly not realistic.
This was true. Not only flight models were coarse, but gunnery was fantastic. You could hit a bomber with a 45mm form 1Km away on those times easily. Thing are far better as they are right now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2013, 04:19 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPS69 View Post
This was true. Not only flight models were coarse, but gunnery was fantastic. You could hit a bomber with a 45mm form 1Km away on those times easily. Thing are far better as they are right now.
Yeah, you're right, had forgotten about that. Set convergence to 1km, get the crosshair over that pixel sized bomber and down it went. It was a great way to stay away from the sniper gunners of back then.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2013, 10:14 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
Yeah, you're right, had forgotten about that. Set convergence to 1km, get the crosshair over that pixel sized bomber and down it went. It was a great way to stay away from the sniper gunners of back then.
The other jewel was the Mig 3, you could bring it out of longitudinal stability, and go out flying as a shuriken. It was a flat spin at high speed. Then was the 190 slower than il2.

Also landing at some point was very difficult, because a P39 won't slow down.

Later came the 190 and i16 rolling over at take off, if at full throttle. But this was allready FB. We have to relearn this sim plenty of times, and allways there was someone discordant with the flight model. Right now, it will be better to stop for a while on that, and take care on other aspects much more important for the improvement of this sim. Specially playability.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.