Quote:
Originally Posted by SG1_Lud
I had to lie a little bit to give it 5 stars but we need to raise the average, which is unfair.
Thanks for the idea Anders.
S!
|
Yeah, lie about how this game is good. Thats pretty sad. Everytime I see things like this it makes me cringe. If the game was good to begin with, or after all the "work" was done to it, nobody would need to lie to other people. It should stand on its own merits. It doesnt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantMk1
ROF has moved on a long way too, for example it has an official dynamic campaign (still in beta and being worked on though) and an unofficial one, plus many more aeroplanes upcoming and even a new Channel map, which is a first for a WW1 sim I think, it is a whole different philosophy over on ROF. Indeed, most negative reviews nowadays stem from either someone buying it not knowing its a simulation, or because they have really terrible Internet connections and cannot download the updates.
CLod has been polished with the new update, but honestly the single player aspect is lacking and only seems to come to life with 3rd parties such as Desastersoft which really seem to show it off very well!
I am interested in what 1C's upcoming news, hopefully they haven't given up and will come out with new ideas on how to keep this franchise going strong into the future.
|
No, RoF does NOT have dynamic campaign. No, not even the "Beta" career is dynamic, nor is Pat Wilsons Campaign Genterator. Everytime people talk about adding one to RoF Jason gets all upset and closes the thread.
I dont see many more 3rd party campaigns coming for CLoD. The only glimpse of seeing good come from it, is if modders get ahold of it.