Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:39 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Actually you don't seem to understand..

First off no where did I say that 9 min to start the engine is correct..

Now that you understand that, allow me to point out the point I was making and that your missing

That being when ever there is a patch released, within minutes of release there is a swarm of posts of BUGS!

How valid it a few min of testing?

I can not explain it.. But it is as if some people have this need to be the first one in line to point out a BUG

Most of which turn out to be un-true!

For example Game Crashes! for those in a hurry, where as those who took the time realised they had to turn of SLI. That one was found by trial and error, but sadly a lot of the so called bugs are due to the fact that the person didn't even take the time to read the post! The post with the link to the patch that contained the information that would have informed the person that what they are experiencing is NOT a bug. Case in point, the mixture reversal that my initial post in this thread pertained to in response to cat's stating the mixture was broken.

In summary you can fit most if not all beta patch users into one of two category

1) People with no patients
2) People with patients

Which is self evident from the fact that we went from it won't start to it will start after 9 min. Which should not be confused with, as you did, with me saying 9 min to start the engine is correct and thus not a bug. That point of mine is what you failed to understand in my post.

Hope that helps! S!
ACE I love your backtracking post above...lol.

However, on this occasion the OP was right, the Hurricane start procedure is porked, but you jumped in again to rescue the dev's and attacked the OP. It is you who have no 'patience' (note the correct spelling), you should of researched it yourself before jumping in, I am sure an apology to the OP would go some way to giving you back at least a little credibility, though to most it will seem once again you have made a complete fool of yourself.

Last edited by Tree_UK; 09-29-2012 at 03:41 PM.
  #2  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:48 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
However, on this occasion the OP was right, the Hurricane start procedure is porked, but you jumped in again to rescue the dev's and attacked the OP.
Ah Tree.. No need talking to you so allow me to point out to others where your twisting of the truth..

First thing to not here folks is that Tree is trying to imply that in my 1st post I said there was nothing wrong with the Hurri start procedure..

Which is not true

For those who actully read the OP, they will note that cat brought up several issues.. One being his inability to start the engine, the other being the mixture issues..

Now for anyone who has read my 1st post they will note that I made no comment as to engine starting issue, my comment had to do with the mixture issue, where I told cat I 'think' it is him in respose to him saying he does not 'think' it is him. Where I posted a quote from Luithers post pointing out the mixture levers were fixxed in this patch, which in turn reversed the way the responded.

So, nice try Tree!

Your twisting of the facts may fool some, and those who want to belive, but for those who actully read what I said know your just making stuff up to keep the lie alive!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #3  
Old 09-29-2012, 04:05 PM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

I'll just say this in response:

This is a release candidate patch from devs who have stated very clearly that they are not putting any more priority or time into fixing Cliffs of Dover until the sequel is released (IF a sequel is released). There will be NO MORE fixing after they publish their last patch. THIS patch.

Yes, it's going to be looked at and tested (by us for free btw) and hopefully these issues will be corrected in the final RC patch but...

How many patches have we had where something gets broken every single time? What confidence is there that even when they tweak and tune this RC patch that something ELSE won't break? With this patch it's the Hurricane engines (again).

So in a system where every released patch breaks something or is unfinished how can there ever be a LAST one where suddenly everything works?

We're all just hoping that the RC patch breaks or doesn't fix something we can live with at this point I think. So I think I can understand Catseye's frustration and post here.

This whole saga of Cliffs of Dover is an exercise in frustration for the faithful. It's pushing everyone to breaking point, some more than others.

We'll keep testing and playing this patch release candidate but seriously think about the fact that this was a bug that got FIXED in the last patch and is back again. And then consider that 1C didn't release this patch as another beta to test, they felt it was good enough to release as a release candidate patch. How does THAT make sense? Saying it's a release candidate patch is just inviting people to lose their minds over the bugs. It should have been pushed as another beta.
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP

No.401 Squadron Forum


Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.