![]() |
|
Technical threads All discussions about technical issues |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Welcome airmalik!!
I am no computer expert.....I got very lucky in purchasing a machine that runs CloD very well. I cannot help you on the Intel vs AMD debate, I have always had Intel. I run all the highest Graphics Settings with no big issues. My Machine Specs: OS: Windows 7 Home Edition x64-bit CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K 3.4GHz RAM: 16GB VIDEO: Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 2GB <---This and CPU GHz "seem" to be the keys to good performance, IMHO. As noted in bold above, a CPU MHz over 3.0 MHz and a graphics card with 2GB appear to be key factors in a smooth game at full graphics settings. There is a recent thread here somewhere, I cannot seem to locate it right now.....it discusses the performance of 1 GB, 1.5 GB and 2 GB video cards running CloD....it included graphs and all kinds of crap....seemed like the 1 GB and 1.5 GB cards were reaching the end of their memory during certain peak periods of gameplay. .
__________________
Günther "Marmus" Von Marmusmann Rank: Unteroffizier Gruppe Position: Schwarmfuhrer, Rote 9 www.iijg53.com My YouTube Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/marmusman ![]() Last edited by Marmusman; 08-17-2012 at 01:56 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the last few years Intel have established a performance lead over AMD, so that's the route I'd go.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...lock,3106.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ck,3106-5.html These links should be useful for you. The second link ranks every processor currently available - and the i7-2700K is ranked a few levels above the AMD FX8150. Having said that so are a host of other cheaper Intel chips (including my Sandy Bridge i5-2500k, which is still up there despite being a year old) One factor as to which Intel chip you go for will be whether you would benefit from the hyper-threading used in the i7 chips [i7-2700K has it]. It can provide a performance boost in some applications (eg video editing) but it is of little or no benefit for gaming. Generally unless you have a specific need for it it doesn't really justify the extra expense over the non-hyperthreaded i5 chips. Also, if you may consider overclocking at some point then get a 'K' suffixed CPU as they have unlocked multipliers. If you're really "not interested in spending an extra 50% to get a 10% boost in performance." then I'd advise you to save yourself about $100 and get one of the K-suffix Core i5 Ivy Bridge chips (Tom's Hardware recommend the i5-3570K at ~$230). Put the money saved towards a better video card instead. On graphics the gtx670 is the current sweetspot from nvidia, offering most of the performance of the gtx680 for considerably less. Not too familiar with the AMD offerings currently but I believe after recent driver improvements they are now pretty much neck and neck with nvidia.
__________________
i5-2500K @3.3GHz / 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 / Asus P8P67 / GTX-260 (216) / WD 500GB Samsung 22" 1680x1050 / Win7 64 Home Premium CH Combat Stick / CH Pro Throttle / Simped Rudder Pedals Last edited by kendo65; 08-17-2012 at 07:54 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
cheers! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it comes down to money. how much do u want to spend. MB, Vcard and CPU are the top 3 expenses. i prefer asus boards, intel cpu and evga cards. i run clod with no issues.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|