![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Video Posted at Today, 02:09 AM
Your reply at Today, 03:49 AM Not even time to watch the whole thing when you found it inbetween.... Nothing to say but that... ![]() Last edited by 5./JG27.Farber; 07-12-2012 at 02:54 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why the **** do you think I would want to watch it? Anyway, a few minute's Googling reveals that John Harris is just another conspiracy-theorist loon (with, yes, you guessed it, a website with a forum with a smattering of antisemitic drivel amongst all the other zaniness). Still, I recommend everyone to watch the last 5 minutes, when Harris tells us that he wants to shut down the internet. Given the deranged ramblings on this forum, maybe he has a point....
P.S. RationalWiki on Harris: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/John_Harris
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. ![]() Last edited by AndyJWest; 07-12-2012 at 03:19 AM. Reason: link to reality |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Meh ... 2 hours is too long.
Anyway ... the influence of the Magna Carta has been substantially reduced in recent times. In most common law countries the legislature is continually enacting new civil legislation which overrides the older common law precedents (Politicians do not like the idea of judges defining laws they want to be able to decide and overrule the courts). Modern capitalist countries like the US pay lip service to the "Rule of Law" (the idea everyone is equal under the law) but in reality being a politician, having money, owning a newspaper or simply being a corporation means you are treated differently in law to the common man. Even serious cases like rape and murder are treated differently depending on who the individual is. Pascal Mazurier is an example of where "Rule of Law" was clearly not applied. Even Habeus Corpus has been overruled in many countries with the flood new Terrorism legislation introduced over the last 10 years. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Habeus corpus originated in the English courts. To follow up on Galway's post I thought I'd touch on the two main different types of legal systems in the world.
One system is based on Roman law and the other on the English common law. Roman law is based on the rights of the state and it gives permissions for citizens to do certain things. For example a law may say that you are allowed to do X, Y and Z because the state gives permission. Common law builds up over time from court decisions and legislation commonly says that you cannot do certain things. For example you can do whatever you like but you cannot do A, B and C because it infringes the rights of others, or you can do other things but you have to do it like so. The split in the different types of systems follows broadly colonial lines, so the USA has a common law system (though its now a hybrid of the two) as do most ex-English colonies. Scotland and most ex-French and Spanish colonies have Roman law systems. In my opinion most countries are having a gradual shift towards state control and this means a shift towards the Roman law system. I feel this is as a response to things like terrorism or external threats, not because of some conspiracy, and this is why habeus corpus is gradually being eroded - the state doing what it wants in order to protect the state and its peoples. Personally I don't have a problem with it as long as it is for the right reasons. What the "right reasons" are is worthy of debate. Then the problem becomes how those reasons are applied. Hood Caveats The above is a very general outline, for a better and fuller explanation do your own research. Any opinions expressed are my own and have nothing to do with previous posts or opinions expressed by anyone on this forum but instead are formed from my own life experiences and from what I do in my work. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Why the 'U' turn? Best Regards, MB_Avro. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|