FPS comparison 15950 - 17582Hotfix - 18301

[Flanker35M]

S!

Nice graphs Dano. Seems the previous beta was quite good performance wise. This latest one introduced slightly less performance than the previous one. Need to test more now when got time finally

[Dano]

Somehow managed to post a double thread while editing to add gfx settings :/

[Flanker35M]

S!

Just doing it in multiple dimensions and they appear in this one Good post that graph with settings included.

[adonys]

don't look for MAX, but for MIN, which is the most important, or at most the AVERAGE performance data.

[addman]

Originally Posted by adonys

don't look for MAX, but for MIN, which is the most important, or at most the AVERAGE performance data.

Yup! I agree, even my modest rig can get over 100 FPS at times but MIN and especially AVERAGE fps is what you need to be looking at. IMO, I'd rather have a constant 30 fps without any hick-ups or slowndowns when I play games rather then a 2 FPS min/120 FPS max rollercoaster.

[Dano]

Originally Posted by adonys

don't look for MAX, but for MIN, which is the most important, or at most the AVERAGE performance data.

I thought you were ignoring me? Anyway, the only reason I posted the MAX figures was because they were beyond the scope of the graph, they're just there for completeness.

Averages are well down, as can be easily seen.

[Aer9o]

what hotfix guys and where is the download link?

[Dano]

Originally Posted by Aer9o

what hotfix guys and where is the download link?

It was for the previous beta patch 17582.