Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2012, 01:43 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
AoA, as correct as you are
Agreed 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
, at no point were such statements retracted.
I seem to recall a post in this forum just prior to release that stated what did and didn't make it into the final release.. wrt what had been talked about over the years of development. If you missed it, sorry bout your bad luck! But even if that is not the case, since they were never official stated, listed, advertised, and or promised said features there was no reason, need, and or requirement to retract them.

Hope that helps!

S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-19-2012, 02:44 AM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post

I seem to recall

S!
Yeah right....post a link to this alleged post before release. Anyone else but Ace remember this pre-release post admitting all the things that were broken or missing from the game? Probably just a dream Ace had...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2012, 11:24 AM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post

I seem to recall a post in this forum just prior to release that stated what did and didn't make it into the final release.. wrt what had been talked about over the years of development. If you missed it, sorry bout your bad luck! But even if that is not the case, since they were never official stated, listed, advertised, and or promised said features there was no reason, need, and or requirement to retract them.

Hope that helps!

S!
First of all, this must surely be a dream of yours, because the team never went through the interviews retracting what features they had claimed would appear in the game.
I'm still waiting for the proof, AoA. Not some ridiculous: "it's there, look for it, good luck!" smarmy post. Genuine, concrete, proof.
Frankly I don't think you've been round these forums long enough in the build up to the game to provide any kind of objective stance on the development, and perceptions in the lead up to the release.

Indeed, surely any information from a member of the team classes any information as official? Without a disclaimer in any interviews to say that such information is subject to change, anyone has reasonable grounds to question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
Yeah right....post a link to this alleged post before release. Anyone else but Ace remember this pre-release post admitting all the things that were broken or missing from the game? Probably just a dream Ace had...
Haha exactly right.

Anyone read Animal Farm? In a year Ace will be telling us it's a dream the game was so poor on release, and that actually it functioned beautifully.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2012, 02:33 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I'm still waiting for the proof, AoA.
Your wait is over..

Luither said this about a month before the RU release of CoD..

Quote:
Originally Posted by luither
I have to add a disclaimer here because when I don't it bites us in the rear. Everything I'm discussing in terms of future plans is a work in progress and is subject to change. As a matter of fact, it's pretty much a guarantee that the final feature will be different from what I'm describing today.

Please gentlemen, understand that game development is a very long, complex process. Plans we describe are just that, plans. Every single thing we said we were working on, we were indeed working on at the time. Working is the key work here. We're doing something no one, including ourselves, has ever done before. So when we tell you that we're working on something, that means we are walking down an uncertain road and we don't know when we get there, and what shape we're going to be in when we do.

WORK. IN. PROGRESS. Please understand these simple words.
link http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=114

Hope this helps!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2012, 05:36 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Your wait is over..

Luither said this about a month before the RU release of CoD..



link http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=114

Hope this helps!
It's helpful, but ambiguous. At no point does he make any suggestion towards features which will be omitted, and as has been pointed out, there is no list of omitted features.

It's a post which people need reminding about though, but doesn't answer the question for the simple fact that Oleg talked of features which were never really discussed again. A map builder, which looked finished - for instance - which many took for granted would just be included.

Anyway, enough of this now. thanks for bringing this post up, as it was a good read
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2012, 05:50 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

WOW.....how are people not getting that the 'ambiguity' is the reason there is no list, the whole point was to say that 'everything' is under review.....as in anything you could care to list is included in the 'blanket' statement.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2012, 06:55 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
WOW.....how are people not getting that the 'ambiguity' is the reason there is no list, the whole point was to say that 'everything' is under review.....as in anything you could care to list is included in the 'blanket' statement.
Bingo!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2012, 07:03 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
WOW.....how are people not getting that the 'ambiguity' is the reason there is no list, the whole point was to say that 'everything' is under review.....as in anything you could care to list is included in the 'blanket' statement.
We know that nothing specific was said. "Someone" here was telling us they did say what would and wouldn't be in the release. I'm not sure who said it....let me look....Oh, here ya go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
I seem to recall a post in this forum just prior to release that stated what did and didn't make it into the final release

I guess we should have just considered the source and known it was fictitious.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-19-2012, 07:07 PM
Lexicon Lexicon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
WOW.....how are people not getting that the 'ambiguity' is the reason there is no list, the whole point was to say that 'everything' is under review.....as in anything you could care to list is included in the 'blanket' statement.
Hello,

Something I dont really get though. What was Luthier's (1C) purpuse to show all those WIP things if in the end he did not have the intention or capabilty
to put it in the game ? Even as a patch ?

Sorry but I dont understand the reasons why...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-19-2012, 07:44 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
WOW.....how are people not getting that the 'ambiguity' is the reason there is no list, the whole point was to say that 'everything' is under review.....as in anything you could care to list is included in the 'blanket' statement.
You miss the point: there are two sagas to the development of CloD as we know it (by that I mean the current DX version of the game):
-the original, pre announcement, updates by Oleg
-the updates, post announcement, by both Oleg and Luthier. (By announcement I mean the first ones with shots over shrek Island)

Luthier's comment was about what he had spoken about: thus the second category. Everything Oleg spoke about and showed in the first saga was either tangible, or treated as a given feature. For instance, he said X would be in the game, and this was never spoken of again.

The ambiguity in question is what Luthier is actually referring to. It's very easy to assume he meant the whole saga of CloD, but really if you were to travel back to the time when Furbs asked that question, it's very likely the previous 'promises' had escaped their attention, and they were thus talking about everything that was in the limelight post announcement.
Features like the map-builder, as I said, were treated as a given to appear in the game. Luthier may have made a post somewhere within a 70 page update topic to say this feature might not be included, but it certainly doesn't support any claim that a feature by feature list of what's not included every surfaced.

And certainly due to the ambiguity which I clearly emphasised, and which Luthier's comment doesn't do justice to, there is every reason for someone to feel misled.

I honestly don't feel the team did intend to mislead at all. However, given that they are working on a sequel already, it poses the question of when these features will be added in. I'd certainly sooner see an SDK and map builder than another scrap in an area I don't care about.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.