Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2012, 12:24 AM
Treetop64's Avatar
Treetop64 Treetop64 is offline
What the heck...?
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fearfactor View Post
...then your 262 should never explode after it catches on fire. It should burn like crazy but not explode....I'm starting this debate, please post your opinion if you care to.
Well, the upper wing surfaces of many Yak-9s weren't supposed to peel off in flight. They should stay tightly glued to the wing structure like crazy, not peel off. But they did peel off. The obvious culprit would be the quality of the glue bonding the wing skin to the structure. Turned out that the camouflage paint on the wings contained an unauthorized substitute ingredient that interacted negatively with the glue, which BTW was applied correctly. In the meantime, the wing structure was redesigned and strengthened. The point is that just because something shouldn't happen in a design doesn't mean that it won't, and the cause isn't always the most obvious one.

You started this "debate", and I'm caring to post my opinion, so don't go flaming me for taking up your invitation.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-2012, 02:53 AM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Maybe Fearfactor didn't give this topic a good start.

But he has a point. On FB release, I didn't cared much about it.
Still, right now after a lot of more reading on the subject, I know it is somewhat exaggerated.

Jumos B engines, being a cheaper version of the Jumo A, got this problem. But on those engines if you pull back the throttle, the engine will flame out.
So, some fire may start, but it will start in a non enclosed area. Also the fuel tank is on the fuselage, and not in the wings. Maybe Luno got a point there, but anyway...

More... there are really not that many reports on this happening when it entered regular employment. Actually I can't find any! It did happened during evaluation, but that wasn't a hazard on normal operations. On the next Jumo, this problem was corrected.

Now, forget the fire at take-off. (That's what I was talking about before)

You fire some bullets at a Me262 engine, and it will always take fire... even if you throttle it out... so, all hits are on the tiny valve? When this happens, I agree with the pilot that bailed out. But the valve is really a small target... why did all the times that this engines are hit, they just got in flames, and they can't be stopped with a dive and fuel cut out?

This really don't connect with operation reports.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2012, 04:31 AM
Treetop64's Avatar
Treetop64 Treetop64 is offline
What the heck...?
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPS69 View Post
Maybe Fearfactor didn't give this topic a good start.
Actually, my post was directed at you. However, since you didn't post the comment that I responded to, then my post is irrelevant. Sorry.... Though on it's own, the technical point I made in the first part still stands.

(Sorry 'bout that, fearfactor.)

Last edited by Treetop64; 06-07-2012 at 04:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2012, 02:29 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Treetop64 View Post
Actually, my post was directed at you.
I acknowledged this, and understood the confusion. Sorry myself for flaming you.
Quote:
Though on it's own, the technical point I made in the first part still stands.
Yes, it still stands... on the Yaks!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2012, 03:27 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

[IMO]

Me 262 has to have some "balancing" damage modelling.

A few MG pings in an engine and your done, its ablaze no matter how much you "dive it out", it reminds me of the FW190 wing damage, few MG hits and its time to head home mission over.

Bf110 has a explosion/flame retardant cockpit you can sit in it all day long surviving with fuel tanks exploding [last count was 45 fuel tanks exploding] also de-winged,
so some strange damage modelling has been around a long time, some has been introduced with the new patches like the bf110 endless exploding fuel tanks.

Would be nice to clean the bugs up but its a thankless task for them at times I imagine.

If it makes no sense and has never been fixed its not a bug its balancing

PS: check the Me262 climb rates also

[/IMO]

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 06-07-2012 at 03:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2012, 04:50 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Actually, there is some reversal on TD work getting more attention.

And more... its happening that there is some place for reasonable discussion here, so why not consider some very old points into mature discussion.

TD work is appreciated, and if they are not putting more things out, I'am sure it is from lack of resources and not from lack of goodwill.

Starting a topic about a weird subject, and keeping it clean, is actually signs of good health.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.