Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2012, 10:54 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
I guess if you look a little bit more, you can find a dozen others, at least half of which could be used with the Merlin.
If you look JtD, it is in every airplane's published material.

Just like the Spitfire Mk I Operating Notes clearly states DtD 230 is the specified fuel.

It is not always in the same location or format, though. Unfortunately they did not think to standardize Operating Instruction formats by convention until much later.

The convention's in place during WWII only agreed the information must be published and followed.
  #2  
Old 06-04-2012, 10:55 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
The evidence for 100% 100 octane use by RAF FC during the BofB is extensive and overwhelming.
Keep repeating it and might come true!!

It worked for Dorathy.
  #3  
Old 06-04-2012, 11:09 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Keep repeating it and might come true!!

It worked for Dorathy.
You have documentation showing how much 87 octane was consumed by RAF Fighter Command.
  #4  
Old 06-04-2012, 11:41 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Other than it is the specified fuel and listed in all the Operating Notes besides the Spitfire Mk II as the required fuel for the type?

Or the fact it is the largest portion of aviation fuel in the Air Ministry and 100 Octane does not make a significant portion of fuel at the airfields until after October 1940?

Seems a pretty lock tight case that 87 Octane fuel was used in considerable amounts....at least according to the Air Ministry.
Actually the proportion of 100 Octane use cf "Other Grades"* rises well before October and stocks of 100 Octane were far healthier than "Other Grades" well before October.





Once again, the only engines cleared to use 100 Octane at the time were Merlin IIs (in reality no Merlin IIs were in frontline use by June 1940) IIIs, XIIs and XXs and Bristol Mercury XV. 52,000 tons of 100 Octane was used July-end October and only a few aircraft types were able to use the stuff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Just the fact it is the specified fuel and the FC consumed millions of gallons of it.
Not that Crumpp has actually proven this by providing one single piece of documentation specifying that only a few frontline FC units were allowed to use 100 octane while the rest had to make do with 87. Payton-Smith specifies that 87 octane was required for non-operational purposes.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Keep repeating it and might come true!!

It worked for Dorathy.
*Crumpp and Kurfurst continually refer only to 87 Octane when other grades of fuel, such as D.T.D 224 (78 Octane, used for de H Gypsy engines etc) were also lumped in with 87 Octane, so the actual amounts of 87 Octane in stock and consumed are lower than the charts would suggest.
  #5  
Old 06-05-2012, 02:02 AM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
If you look JtD, it is in every airplane's published material.

Just like the Spitfire Mk I Operating Notes clearly states DtD 230 is the specified fuel.
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/no611-100oct.jpg
and
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/no74-100oct.jpg
and:



Apparently not.

You are quoting from a pre 1940 manual.

Last edited by Seadog; 06-05-2012 at 06:48 AM.
  #6  
Old 06-05-2012, 04:31 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

As it stands neither Crumpp nor Kurfurst have added anything useful to this thread, including any documentation showing that FC required the majority of its squadrons to continue to use 87 Octane while only a small proportion are to use 100; all they are doing is regurgitating everything they've previously pushed in the 170 plus page thread on 100 Octane, ignoring everything that's been posted there. I cannot see any future in responding to either of them as long as they have nothing new to present which comprehensively refutes everything that has been posted here and elsewhere.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.