Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:54 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Look at the link to my infraction and then apologise.
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

Your saying the following post i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK
Thanks for the update Blacksix, when you had the first last minute glitch a long while ago, which was the decals I assume you tested everything and it was all running sweet apart from the decal issue, you then fixed all of that and tested again only to have a last minute glitch with the particles, now you have fixed that and now the next last minute glitch is with the graphics engine. How are all these issues connected?
Is why the mods gave you 10 infraction points

And your saying the following post i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK
Don't need the code, just the truth will do
Translated..

You don't need the 'code' from the devs, you need the 'truth' from the devs

As in the devs have not given us the 'truth' thus far, aka the devs are lying.


Is not the reason you recived 10 infraction points

Is that what you want us to belive?

Or would it be more likely that one of the mods took pity on you, and instead of banning you for calling the devs liars he only gave you 10 infraction points..

See to me (and I am sure others) the latter seems more reasonable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Im done with you now,
Promise?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
everyone knows whats what here.
Agreed 100%
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 04-20-2012 at 06:58 PM.
  #2  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:58 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

Your saying the following post i.e.



Is what the mods why the mods gave you 10 infraction points

And your saying the following post i.e.



Translated..

You don't need the 'code' from the devs, you need the 'truth' from the devs

As in the devs have not given us the 'truth' thus far, aka the devs are lying.


Is not the reason you recived 10 infraction points

Is that what you want us to belive?

Or would it be more likely that one of the mods took pity on you, and instead of banning you for calling the devs liars he only gave you 10 infraction points.. See to me the latter seems more reasonable.


Promise?


Agreed 100%
No the post I made was the following which was removed by the Mod concerned, but david quoted it on the same page as the link to the infraction, This was the post - Could you ask someone please Blacksix, or get a better explanation rather than its the graphic engine. Many thanks

You could always simply ask the mod responsible which post he gave the infraction for, then you can apologise to me like the nice man you are. Then like you agreed earlier you can start a campaign to get those infraction points removed because like you have already stated I should not have got those infractions for asking a simple question. Many Thanks.

Last edited by Tree_UK; 04-20-2012 at 07:02 PM.
  #3  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:04 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
No the post I made was the following which was removed by the Mod concerned, but david quoted it on the same page as the link to the infraction, This was the post - Could you ask someone please Blacksix, or get a better explanation rather than its the graphic engine. Many thanks
Ok allow me to update my post with your new infomation..

Your saying the following post i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK
Could you ask someone please Blacksix, or get a better explanation rather than its the graphic engine. Many thanks
Is why the mods gave you 10 infraction points

And your saying the following post i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK
Don't need the code, just the truth will do
Translated..

You don't need the 'code' from the devs, you need the 'truth' from the devs

As in the devs have not given us the 'truth' thus far, aka the devs are lying.


Is not the reason you recived 10 infraction points

Is that what you want us to belive?

Or would it be more likely that one of the mods took pity on you, and instead of banning you for calling the devs liars he only gave you 10 infraction points..

See to me (and I am sure others) the latter seems more reasonable.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #4  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:16 PM
159th_Jester 159th_Jester is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 104
Default

Ace, you're doing nothing more than trying to provoke Tree into a response that the mods would want to take action against.

Unless your English comprehension skills are below par, you would understand that Tree's post that you keep quoting referred to the request for more detailed explanation, not the information supplied by the devs on the whole. As such, he called no-one a liar.

I doubt very much there's anything wrong with your comprehesnion skills, so have to ask why you seem hellbent on provoking Tree into a response that will likely get him banned?
  #5  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:21 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For the simple reason that Aces and Hayward always do this. For the sheer enjoyment of it.

It is a game that seems more important to them than the actual game at hand.

There has never been any substance behind it, and never will.

Further, they probably assume, correctly, that they enjoy a certain amount of leeway under the 'pro-Clod' umbrella.

Hence the various reponses.
  #6  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:25 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
Further, they probably assume, correctly, that they enjoy a certain amount of leeway under the 'pro-Clod' umbrella.

Hence the various reponses.
But if that was true.. Than I would have never been banned.. Yet I have been banned (vacation) in the past.. Thus I think most would agree that your conspiracy theory does not hold much merit
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #7  
Old 04-20-2012, 07:23 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 159th_Jester View Post
Unless your English comprehension skills are below par, you would understand that Tree's post that you keep quoting referred to the request for more detailed explanation, not the information supplied by the devs on the whole. As such, he called no-one a liar.
That is your opinion and your welcome to it, just know that I and others don't agree with it! S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.