Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[lane]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

Some must have been at North Weald for 151 Sqn and 611 Sqn.

Some must have been at Drem for 111 Sqn.

602 Squadron also at Drem

[335th_GRAthos]

I am sorry to jump into this discussion (I would prefer to burn in my burning Bf109 with a properly exploding central fuel tank than post in this thread, LOL) but I there is something that raised my curiocity:

I am looking at the numbers for the first year of war (Sep.'39 - Aug.'40)
Did anybody notice that the line Total for first year numbers make no sense?


Just wonder what the reason may be for this discrepancy.

~S~

[lane]

Originally Posted by 335th_GRAthos

I am looking at the numbers for the first year of war (Sep.'39 - Aug.'40)
Did anybody notice that the line Total for first year numbers make no sense?

Actually, the figures do add up and do make sense. The figures given are Monthly Average Consumption in thousands of tons.

For the 1st Year of War Sept.-Nov.'39, 16 is given as the monthly average, in thousands of tons, for that 3 months period.
With that understanding (16x3) + (14x3) + (23x3) + (10x3) + (26x3) = 267