![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S!
This is where RoF has the edge. The planes do not blend or disappear 500m from you. In one patch they improved the contrast and how planes are modelled against terrain. And that made a difference. The planes sure are hard to see in certain situations, but they do not magically just disappear. CoD has same LOD problems as IL-2 had, sadly. So if the viewing/LOD would be fixed too then we would have it as it should. Now you can have FM/DM down to the last nut and rivet but if you can not see things how will you use that? ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Alienware Aurora|Win 7 64-bit Home Premium|IC i7-920 Processor (Quad-Core)|14GB DDR3 RAM|1 TB SATA 7200rpm Hard Drive|GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 770 2GB WINDFORCE 3 X fan|Thrustmaster Warthog|Saitek Pro Combat rudder pedals,throttle quadrant and Cessna trim wheel|TrackIR4|Sense of humour,I find it comes in handy! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
(have to register) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No, they turn into mini 5 pixel X-wings which stay the same size regardless of how far away they are. It's rubbish.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
So from these two I choose the ROF's one all the day. Of course both are not right. The Insuber's episode is an example of why I don't fly IL2 anymore...
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did test the Hurricane Mk I and the Spitfire II today. It seems further adjustments are necessary, as the update does not mention any tweaks in rolls rates.
The Hurricane rolls 1.5 times slower than it should at 400 mph IAS. The Spitfire IIa rolls 3.2 times faster than it should at 400 mph IAS. I did not test the rest but it seems likely that its true for the other Spits and Hurris too. See my findings and the original documents here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...30&postcount=6
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() Last edited by Kurfürst; 04-16-2012 at 03:33 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Winger |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Spit II rolls too fast, the Hurri rolls a bit too slow. Sorry if it was misunderstandable.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So you guys are already complaining about the flight models for the FM revisions in the patch that hasn't been released yet...
The common saying here is usually: "Wait until the body is cold", but can you at least wait until it's born before you start trash talking? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|