Cliffs of Dover, a Year Later

[csThor]

You know the principle of the other release (World of Tanks)? This is anything but realistic, it's an arcade shooter and nothing else. That one will follow the same gameplay idea and will not be a simulation, either.

[Insuber]

Originally Posted by machoo

WOWP looks superior to COD in every way as far as I can see. Defenatley far better graphics , flight model no worse then COD , better effects . Map size I don't care about. You only fly when it boils down to it , a fairly small concentrated area on the way and around your objectives.

So once again , why do you need to make an entire country that looks fake.

"FM no worse than CoD" ... I'd wish you give us some data to substantiate this statement. As far as the big maps, they are mandatory for anything beyond the instant dogfight arcade game style.
But if you like WOWP, go in peace instead of trying to convince us that it's a superior game. Play with it and enjoy it, what's the issue? Ah yessss ... it's not available yet ... LOL!

Chivas said:

>>Falstaff, didn't you say you were leaving the forums, and you wanted the forum to delete your account, why don't you do everyone a favor, and actually accomplish something you say your going to do. <<

Real last resort stuff, Chivas. Well done.

BTW, I did, they did, and I did. And now I've come back briefly, like the ghost of games-past, to haunt all your matter-of-fact Mr Reasonableness statements. The ones peppered with 'probably', 'will', 'should', 'if', 'when' time after time. Just once, try swapping the future and conditional tenses for the present tense. As for the past, they do things differently there.

You failed to answer a single point above. Is the playground and peanut gallery really the better option (I believe you're an adult?)

Ben

Whats so realistic about COD?

[Insuber]

TROLL
1a. Noun
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.

(...)

1c. Noun
A member of an internet forum who continually harangues and harasses others. Someone with nothing worthwhile to add to a certain conversation, but rather continually threadjacks or changes the subject, as well as thinks every member of the forum is talking about them and only them. Trolls often go by multiple names to circumvent getting banned.

[Wolf_Rider]

multiple names (accounts) - or multinics, as they are sometimes known... are known as sockpuppets

[Chivas]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

Chivas said:

>>Falstaff, didn't you say you were leaving the forums, and you wanted the forum to delete your account, why don't you do everyone a favor, and actually accomplish something you say your going to do. <<

Real last resort stuff, Chivas. Well done.

BTW, I did, they did, and I did. And now I've come back briefly, like the ghost of games-past, to haunt all your matter-of-fact Mr Reasonableness statements. The ones peppered with 'probably', 'will', 'should', 'if', 'when' time after time. Just once, try swapping the future and conditional tenses for the present tense. As for the past, they do things differently there.

You failed to answer a single point above. Is the playground and peanut gallery really the better option (I believe you're an adult?)

Ben

When you go on a long quote fest, I can't be bothered to read your posts let alone answer the drivel. You've gone on and on about the developer not living up to what they say they're going to do, you say your leaving, yet here you are. TROLL

Chivas said:

>>When you go on a long quote fest, I can't be bothered to read your posts let alone answer the drivel. <<

Can't answer the points, revert to type, insults and playground. Factual alooofness now MIA.

>>You've gone on and on about the developer not living up to what they say they're going to do<<

Well, that's because they haven't. A year later. And the talk is of the next one.

>>you say your leaving, yet here you are. TROLL <<

I left and came back briefly. Deal with it, as they say. Perhaps if I hadn't had to put my wellies on and wade through months of steaming supposition and nasty posing-on-high from various members, I'd have stayed out of here.

Would you like a hand putting your toys back in the pram? (Has some sort of distance record has been achieved?)

You've dished out enough, both slyly and overtly.

I am tired of everything been hazed over with with wilful mis-reading of the facts as they are known, and the tiresome fox-and-hounds chase after anyone who dares point out the obvious. It's as if the basic compass points are reversed.

And see if you can resist replying.

Ben

[Thee_oddball]

Originally Posted by csThor

You know the principle of the other release (World of Tanks)? This is anything but realistic, it's an arcade shooter and nothing else. That one will follow the same gameplay idea and will not be a simulation, either.

^^this

[Vittuuntunut]

Originally Posted by csThor

You know the principle of the other release (World of Tanks)? This is anything but realistic, it's an arcade shooter and nothing else. That one will follow the same gameplay idea and will not be a simulation, either.

You maybe know this, but just to clarify: War Thunder-World of Planes (by Gaijin Entertainment) and World of Warlplanes (by Wargaming.net) are totally different games.