Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

For what I said reading the Australian archive is that there was 100oct but the use was not in line with what is put frwd by you and your afficionados. It simple as tht.
I did say tht there is the logical hypothesis that 100 octane was used as a meaning to make available the stock of old fuel (74?) due to the probably huge quantity stocked and the very high price of tht fuel.

It's seems very easy to check to see if I am right or wrong as I said : as we hve the qty of old fuel and 100oct per month and the formula for the blending, just making the math shld give an accurate awnser.

However
I don't take orders from anyone NZTyph and certainly don't think that there is any time left for discussion after being insulted.

You better take tht into account.

This debate is over for me as... there is no debate.

What insult?

[lane]

Robert Schlaifer, Development of Aircraft Engines, (Harvard University, Boston, 1950). pp 222 - 223

[fruitbat]

Originally Posted by Al Schlageter

What insult?

probably showing evidence that he's wrong.

reading this thread, and a few peoples opinion reminds me of this,