Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Do you want the old style IL2 1946 COOP Interface implemented into CloD?
Yes 140 79.55%
No 10 5.68%
Not Fussed 26 14.77%
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2011, 07:25 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
WHAT THE HELL...

ABSOULUTELY CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF AOA changing the argument....
What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
NO one said it couldn't be done
I don't have the time to look back at each post.. But I did get the impression that some were saying that.. If that is not the case, than sorry for the mixup

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
but it takes much longer and is a pain compared to il2... and its not only the "coop" the whole user interface is FUBAR...
Change is always a pain

More so for some than others

All I know for sure is the mission builders ask 1C for more control.. 1C listen to them and gave us what we have.. More control with more flexibility.. And for some reason 1C could not provide both the old and new methods. Had 1C changed nothing, all these posts requesting the old COOP GUI would be replaced by posts stating 1C didn't give us any more control than IL-2 had in mission building

1C.. Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't

You can never make everyone happy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Your defending this.. a 2 year old could make a better interface in his sleep for crying out loud.
That is your opinion and you welcome to it.. But in light of the fact that no 2 year olds have stepped up to the plate I think you assessment is in error

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
You guys are barmy... stop defending this game so much everyone here want it to succeed we are simply laying out some things that have been left out an shouldn't have been...
Laying? I think I know what you meant, and I am not lying.. And I would also appreciate you not implying that I am and if you could refrain from calling me names like barny that would be appreciated too! Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
You are given us hell when we ask for a simple feature that should be there...
Ask yourself Krupi..

If it was so simple..

Why didn't they do it in the first place?

Your answer will be very telling

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
STOP DEFENDING THE "GAME" SO MUCH...
So pointing out the facts is defending?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.