Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

View Poll Results: I would like to see Reflection incorporated into CLIFFS OF DOVER
Yes 71 95.95%
No 3 4.05%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2011, 09:39 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I saw a glint off a Spitfire's wind screen online last night.

Looked really good too.

However, I think there are bigger fish to fry at this point.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2011, 10:26 PM
GOA_Potenz GOA_Potenz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 210
Default

that's the way you spot enemy aircraft in rof, mostly when you lose them against the terrain
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2011, 12:13 AM
snwkill snwkill is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 94
Default

I can deal with no reflections... especially when we are struggling to keep decent FPM's at the current state.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2011, 01:34 AM
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger's Avatar
TUSA/TX-Gunslinger TUSA/TX-Gunslinger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 195
Default

Why is it whenever someone comes up with a new development idea/request, a large portion of all respondents on this forum come up with a "don't bother with this until they fix the other stuff" response?

Think about this for a minute. Developing code takes time. The largest percentage of effort always goes to the stuff that's months away, not weeks away.

If the ideas that you want to see next year - are not placed "in the hopper" - then basically, you don't run a good chance of ever seeing them.

In other words, making requests now - produces results next year - not anytime soon. Because a user has a brilliant idea on the forum, it never means that current efforts are abandoned to implement that idea.

Bottom line is, Squelching new ideas does not help produce fixes to your current problems faster. Negativity toward a new idea, only sends the message that the idea is not an important feature.

As to the OP's suggestion - Brilliant. Without specular features in the visual model, low level bombers will never have to worry about being spotted on a map. Easy points. The density of the ground textures, and the paucity of real world physics workarounds - have created a very unnaturally low vis environment under VFR conditions.

19 to 1 says the "silent majority" gets it too.

S!

Gunny
__________________
Intel i7-3930K @ 4.00 MHz - ASUS Rampage IV
EVGA 3072MB VRAM GTX 580
16GB RAM - Windows 7/64
Warthog and U2Nxt Cougar under t.a.r.g.e.t

Last edited by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger; 12-05-2011 at 01:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2011, 02:42 AM
Ailantd's Avatar
Ailantd Ailantd is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 290
Default

If this is introduced then, and when fps allow for it, this kind of glares should be added too to other objects, like houses, cars, etc... when flying you see a lot of these in cities and urban areas... etc
__________________
Win 7 64
Quad core
4Gb ram
GTX 560
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2011, 03:06 AM
steppie's Avatar
steppie steppie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 78
Default

it does have refection
if you look at your gauges there refection there.
__________________

http://www.raafsquad.com
Intel® I7-3770 3.5Ghz,8G DDR3 ram,Gainward Phantom GeForce GTX680 2048MB,window Ultimate 7 64,trackir 4,CH Fighterstick,Saitek X52 Throttle,Saitek rudder pedals
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2011, 03:57 AM
Ailantd's Avatar
Ailantd Ailantd is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steppie View Post
it does have refection
if you look at your gauges there refection there.
They are not asking about that reflections, but a very long distance quick glare when the sun reflects in the cockpit glass or wings at the correct angle... like when the hero sees the bad guy hiding in the far hills because the sun reflects in the bad guy binoculars.
__________________
Win 7 64
Quad core
4Gb ram
GTX 560
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2011, 08:03 PM
He111's Avatar
He111 He111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steppie View Post
it does have refection
if you look at your gauges there refection there.
THATS where I saw it! .. and it looks cooool!

Light flashes off cockpits might be a good option but not essential. Didn't airforces paint their planes to stop light flashes off bare metal ? all except the Americans who wanted to announce to the world .. " WE ARE HERE! " (wet your pants)

.
__________________
.
========================================
.
.....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--.....
.
========================================
-oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A
-oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair
-oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73)
-oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit
-oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo-
========================================
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2011, 10:56 AM
6BL Bird-Dog's Avatar
6BL Bird-Dog 6BL Bird-Dog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger View Post
Why is it whenever someone comes up with a new development idea/request, a large portion of all respondents on this forum come up with a "don't bother with this until they fix the other stuff" response?

Think about this for a minute. Developing code takes time. The largest percentage of effort always goes to the stuff that's months away, not weeks away.

If the ideas that you want to see next year - are not placed "in the hopper" - then basically, you don't run a good chance of ever seeing them.

In other words, making requests now - produces results next year - not anytime soon. Because a user has a brilliant idea on the forum, it never means that current efforts are abandoned to implement that idea.

Bottom line is, Squelching new ideas does not help produce fixes to your current problems faster. Negativity toward a new idea, only sends the message that the idea is not an important feature.

As to the OP's suggestion - Brilliant. Without specular features in the visual model, low level bombers will never have to worry about being spotted on a map. Easy points. The density of the ground textures, and the paucity of real world physics workarounds - have created a very unnaturally low vis environment under VFR conditions.

19 to 1 says the "silent majority" gets it too.

S!

Gunny
I will happily second that Gunny
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2011, 11:26 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Funny that even Mig Alley from Rowan had cockpit glints from shiny surface..and that was ages ago! Sure nothing compared to today's standards but anyway. Was the first sign of Mig15's when a glint of their shiny fuselages was seen at distance..oh the times

As of CoD. Agreed with Gunny that features should be taken into consideration to be implemented later on AFTER the GFX engine is sorted out and they can start using it to the full. Now we have something that is not that tweaked or ready, but working at least.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.