Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: When will the next beta patch be released?
thursday!!! 1 0.74%
this friday 18 13.24%
during next week 15 11.03%
during the week after the next week 12 8.82%
in three weeks 9 6.62%
after a month 12 8.82%
two months 2 1.47%
three months 5 3.68%
this year, hopefully.. 20 14.71%
in two weeks 42 30.88%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2011, 04:44 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Well, CoD has been a bumpy road but I think eventually it will get there. And Battle For Moscow sure will help as it will bring in funds needed for further development. So I remain hopefull that IL-2 series will once again rise. RoF had it rough and now it is a totally different thing than when released so why would IL-2 not succeed as well.

Sure the development and these years we waited did NOT bring on the table what we expected from the previous work. But anyways improvements are coming so..
  #2  
Old 12-02-2011, 04:56 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

9 months after release and still no fsaa, thats shameful really its 2011 for godsake. They do not deserve any success in truth with any product.
  #3  
Old 12-02-2011, 05:00 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Tree, I play every game without FSAA as I do not need it..For me FSAA or lack of it is not a gauge of measuring the game quality. I could play with less fancy graphics if the core of the game was rock solid, like FM/DM etc. Future will tell what happens with IL-2 series..I for one do not wish it to fail as we have NOTHING compared to it except the original IL-2 series..and no other company is making a sim that can be taken seriously atm...
  #4  
Old 12-02-2011, 05:04 PM
reflected reflected is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 346
Default

Quote:
and no other company is making a sim that can be taken seriously atm...
Seriously? I bet you've never tried RoF. Or A2A's FSX addons. CloD has a long way to go - in which I wish them good luck, I love this game and it has great potential.
  #5  
Old 12-02-2011, 05:11 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

RoF yes A2A seriously... Are they adding weapons now? Doubt it.

So there are no other ww2 fight sims... Simple FACT
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
  #6  
Old 12-02-2011, 07:01 PM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
RoF yes A2A seriously... Are they adding weapons now? Doubt it.

So there are no other ww2 fight sims... Simple FACT
The A2A Spitfire with the Accusim stuff is actually a lot of fun and seems amazingly well modelled - even without guns that fire.

It may not be a WWII combat flight sim, but it's definitely a WWII flight sim. If you've never tried flying the A2A Spit and you have the chance to do so, you should. Might not be your cup of tea, but it's definitely an experience.

At the very least it'll make you wish the cockpits in CloD were that detailed and functional.
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP

No.401 Squadron Forum


Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book
  #7  
Old 12-02-2011, 07:05 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Never tried the A2A Spit. Is it totally accurate? As in, do you think you could actually start and run a real Spitfire after spending some time with the sim?
  #8  
Old 12-02-2011, 10:26 PM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bw_wolverine View Post
The A2A Spitfire with the Accusim stuff is actually a lot of fun and seems amazingly well modelled - even without guns that fire.

It may not be a WWII combat flight sim, but it's definitely a WWII flight sim. If you've never tried flying the A2A Spit and you have the chance to do so, you should. Might not be your cup of tea, but it's definitely an experience.

At the very least it'll make you wish the cockpits in CloD were that detailed and functional.
To be a WWII flight sim you would need a WWII map, environments and associated objects to fly in. I thought the A2A Spitfire whas just a plane. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Also, how does FSX go with thirty odd players go in the one map. WWII was all about formations of aircraft.

Both apples and oranges are very good but difficult to compare.

My understanding of the FSX and A2A spitfire is that you have a modern day flight sim with a WWII aircraft (very detailed) in it. But that does not make it a WWII Flight Sim.

Cheers!

Last edited by Skoshi Tiger; 12-02-2011 at 10:51 PM.
  #9  
Old 12-02-2011, 05:14 PM
BPickles BPickles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reflected View Post
Seriously? I bet you've never tried RoF. Or A2A's FSX addons. CloD has a long way to go - in which I wish them good luck, I love this game and it has great potential.
While I agree with you about potential, its totally unrealized. Its now clear to me that CLOD was just a cash booster to make way for the real game Battle for Moscow and to test the game engine out but make money doing it.
This would never have happened back when IL2 was IL2, now its a different animal and we are dealing with a company(s) that will release something saying its finished when they know otherwise.
I think reality shows the truth.
  #10  
Old 12-02-2011, 05:28 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.