Luthier Update Clarification Please

[ParaB]

After the CloD release I for one will be very cautious when it comes to buying another 1C/Luthier product.

I already got burned with Pacific Fighters and I only bought the 1946 addon out of a sense of loyalty. My goodwill towards the creators of IL2, Forgotten Battles and the Aces Expansion pack has been pretty much exhausted by now.

[JG52Krupi]

There is one thing missing from that poster that I also wish was missing from the my limited edition box.

And before some smart ass says the reason it isn't shown, I know 1C was behind the Russian version.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

If your financial 'worth' (read your starbuck's job or allowance from your parents) is such that your 'life' will be impacted by the outcome of a $50 dollar game, than I highly recommend that you give up flight simming or any other aspect of PC gaming and play something you can afford, like checkers! Which in turn would mean you would not have to make those hard decisions in life like 'flight sim' vs. 'shoes for the kids' or 'flight sim' vs. 'eating tonight'. Just a thought!

+1

[=FI=Scott]

Originally Posted by ParaB

After the CloD release I for one will be very cautious when it comes to buying another 1C/Luthier product.

I already got burned with Pacific Fighters and I only bought the 1946 addon out of a sense of loyalty. My goodwill towards the creators of IL2, Forgotten Battles and the Aces Expansion pack has been pretty much exhausted by now.

Absolutely.

Sequel ! you are having a laugh. Not until a PC within the advertised specs can run this game adequately and reliably.

[robtek]

Yes, i concur!

1c should really change the specs!!!!

Say i.e. a quad-core with 3 Ghz, a GT560 or HD6850 with min. 1GB and 8GB Ram coupled with win7/64 as minimum requirement.

Makes developing easier and more futureproof, i believe.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

I don't know if that would do it?

Take cigarettes labels for example..

For the past 30+ years they have been putting labels on the package that said smoking is bad for your health.. Yet there are still 'some' that claim they 'didn't know' it was bad for them and are trying to sue cigarette companies

This same mentality applies to people who look at the specs on the box and note that their 3 year old PC 'meets' the specs..

They run home..

Install the game..

And even before they try and fly once!

They go to the options menu and crank all the settings up to max or high..

Than sit back and wonder why the game runs like a slide show..

Worse they they come here and play the victim and act as if they were some how cheated or fooled into buying the game

Never stopping to consider that maybe.. just maybe the 'min requirements' on the box means they will have to use 'min settings' in the game

If it wasn't so sad it would be funny as hell!

[Bakelit]

Originally Posted by ParaB

After the CloD release I for one will be very cautious when it comes to buying another 1C/Luthier product.

I already got burned with Pacific Fighters and I only bought the 1946 addon out of a sense of loyalty. My goodwill towards the creators of IL2, Forgotten Battles and the Aces Expansion pack has been pretty much exhausted by now.

Abso - freakin - lutely.

Gut gesagt, ParaB.

[Ze-Jamz]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

I don't know if that would do it?

Take cigarettes labels for example..

For the past 30+ years they have been putting labels on the package that said smoking is bad for your health.. Yet there are still 'some' that claim they 'didn't know' it was bad for them and are trying to sue cigarette companies

This same mentality applies to people who look at the specs on the box and note that their 3 year old PC 'meets' the specs..

They run home..

Install the game..

And even before they try and fly once!

They go to the options menu and crank all the settings up to max or high..

Than sit back and wonder why the game runs like a slide show..

Worse they they come here and play the victim and act as if they were some how cheated or fooled into buying the game

Never stopping to consider that maybe.. just maybe the 'min requirements' on the box means they will have to use 'min settings' in the game

If it wasn't so sad it would be funny as hell!

HAHAHAHAHHA

Lol, you want to look at the minimum and recommended hardware on the back of the box that i have in front of me, then go speak to then peeps that have that exact system and explain to them why they couldnt run it on ANY settings..

Come on mate, play the game... pardon the pun

[ACE-OF-ACES]

yawn

anysetting.. sure.. sure.. sure

[Ze-Jamz]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

yawn

anysetting.. sure.. sure.. sure

Oh Dear..

Deluded

I will make it easier for you to digest, 'recommended' means slide show then does it? and the games settings need to be on the very minimum to run at even 10+FPS... thats normal then for you is it?

Thats what normally happens?

Please

Il EDIT this just so we understand each other and everyone can laugh at you..

Without bringing up stuff that has been flogged to death...what your saying is that a lot of people had problems because of their system specs and that they should of known that Minimum means 'complete rubbish' and Recommended in the world of gaming actually means 'yes you can play it but it will look like crap, worse than IL2 infact and that dont expect to put anything over MED settings' and that Developers actually only want the buying public to play their games on LOw-MED settings instead of actually seeing the game in akk its glory and appreciating the GFX engine and the GFX design that has cost fk*n sh*t loads!

LMAO

And please change your Sig, cuz thats horse shyte too... as proven