Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2011, 08:00 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default Is there any chance that the P-47 load-out can be corrected to 2x1000lb and 1x500lb?

Just wondering if it will be possible o have the P-47 load-out corrected after all these years so that it is historically correct with the 500lb on the centre supports and a 1000lb under each wing?

Hopefully a simple, but realistic 'tweak'?

Cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2011, 09:44 PM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

Here's an interesting thread on some various loadout options. Considering how many options there are, it may be more feasable to alter the way in which loudouts are selected: chose by hardpoint/bomb-bay.

http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/tec...uts-14154.html

For instance, in a Ju-88, the player could chose the loadout for the front bomb-bay, and leave the rear bay empty, instal a fuel tank, or more bombs!

For planes like the TB-3 or Pe-8, the player can chose whether the bombs are placed internally, externally, or both.

And finally, for aircraft like the P-47, the player could select extra ammo, or remove a pair of guns, or alternate between a couple belting patterns while choosing a bomb load for each hardpoint: frag bombs, 250lbs, 500lbs, 1000lbs and various drop tank combinations.

This could also allow asymmetrical loudouts of some Japanese fighters which sometimes carried a bomb on one wing, and a drop tank on the other.

The drop-down fields could be labelled "Guns" with a list, "Hardpoint 1" with a list for the forward bomb-bay or right-most hardpoint, "Hardpoint 2" with a list for the rear-bomb bay or middle harpoint, and "Hardpoint 3" with a list for the external racks or the left-most hardpoint.

The main advantage is being able to pick the loadout the player needs without resorting to an extremely long list in which it may be annoying to find the combination that one wants (some aircraft have over 30 options I think)

Last edited by Romanator21; 09-20-2011 at 09:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-20-2011, 01:34 PM
310thDiablo's Avatar
310thDiablo 310thDiablo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 56
Talking

I would be happy if they could jsut put API and APIT ammo on my Jugs.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2011, 01:35 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

Well I think it's a valid point to ask for correct load-outs on the P-47. It has to be one of the game's most under-developed aircraft when you consider just how much of a work-horse it was in WW2.

For years it has been left in a truly tragic condition, the cockpits are one of the worst in the game andit is sad to see such a great aircraft cobbled together.

I hope that maybe the P-47 will get a revamp in a future update, at-least the cockpit getting a make-over, as, when you consider the modded verions, there really has to be hope!

However, considering load-out, surely it is possible to have the payload corrected and maybe the APIT or API tracer added...so it actually can be used to it's full ability?

Cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-23-2011, 10:09 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

I think correcting the P-47s shouldn't be too much of a problem

As for the belting. That is, I think anyways, a more complex issue. As it stands right now there is one piece of code for all M2 .50cals (to the best of my knowledge anyways). So if you change the belting on one... you change it on all. Really the API/APIT late war ammo should probably only show up on a couple of aircraft. Say the P-38L Late, P-47D, maybe the D-27 and the P-51D-20. Not sure if that type of ammo saw usage in the Pacific either... I don't know.

So how do you get the loadout right? Optional ammo belting built in to the game? If so then it's a bigger task to get that right for every aircraft type and for every gun too. I think that'd be incredibly cool but a large task for sure.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:49 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

API was neither rare nor really late war, but certainly no common early war ammo either.

A belting change for the .50 would definitely help to improve realism for US warbirds, even if it did not include API, the currently belting plainly sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2011, 11:41 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysticpuma View Post
Just wondering if it will be possible o have the P-47 load-out corrected after all these years so that it is historically correct with the 500lb on the centre supports and a 1000lb under each wing?

Hopefully a simple, but realistic 'tweak'?

Cheers, MP
it cant be corrected , but the correct one should be included.

Once in the past a loadout was corrected (actually deleted, in the IAR81s), that caused crashes in missions where these loadouts were set. After this experience, an actually wrong loadout option was never deleted again IIRC. But as i said, sure the historical correct one can be added.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2011, 05:34 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

It can be corrected. You saw that in 4.10 already, and will see it again in 4.11.

But which P-47 did actually fly with 2x1000 + 1x500? Only references I found in a brief search were 2x1000 or 3x500.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.