Suggestion for the Developers

[Space Communist]

Originally Posted by Phazon

I know what you are trying to say. Honestly I don't think MG would be up to the task, they are very good with the technical stuff (as they should be for making flight sims) but they don't have the creative resources to do something like that.

In my opinion the best thing they could ever do is something like Rise of Flight's new career mode. Let the players make their own story and just provide a vessel for them to keep track of their journey. Let them feel apart of a squadron / stabstaffel and actually feel sorry to lose wingmen or feel proud when they earn a medal.

I agree, but with the stipulation that they do the one thing RoF lacks, and that's the ability to play that dynamic campaign co-op. If that were added my friend and I would likely forget that all other games exist for years. Also we would buy every single plane/expansion if they go with that model.

[smoki]

Originally Posted by cheesehawk

I don't believe there was voice work, but he had new art, intro movies, and lots of other fluff. If you still play 1946 at all, I definitely recommend trying all his campaigns. Legion Kondor is especially nice, as you start in a trainer (you are still training when his story starts), gets to a stunt in a Ju-52, then puts you finally into a 109. Excellent story, with a plot twist and revenge mission!

Will do!

Originally Posted by No601_Swallow

A couple of great fun story-driven campaigns are "castaways" and "bushpigs" (I think).

As much characterisation as you could wish for (even though you're Australian - but hold your nose and you'll be OK ).

http://www.mission4today.com/index.p...=details&id=29

Thanks.

Originally Posted by Danelov

The intro

Something like that, although this was just a "little bit" cheesy and corny (look what you did....now I'm hungry).

But something like that. Although I was aiming for something more serious not so "cartoony". Something more in the style of Band of Brothers (I'll assume you've seen or at least heard of it... don't hate on me again for bringing something non-aircraft related ), y'know? Just, not only an intro, but throughout the whole campaign, and essentially between missions, as in their starts and ends, and not always about the way the dogfights start, in fact, not so much often at all (it would get lame pretty fast), but sometimes more about the wider picture of the war, seen, or better said heard (as in what the pilots heard), from the pilots' perspectives. Y'know, I wanna feel like my wingmen are real people.

Originally Posted by Rattlehead

I'm not interested in the idea at all.

Firstly, thanks for typing out such a long and well thought-out post. Obviously you have given this a good deal of thought.

For me though, it's not neccessary to have pre-scripted events in a simulator. I'm not at all in favour of it, simply because what makes a simulator like this fun is precisely all the random, unscripted events. I've seen burning planes flash across my windscreen, but they were unscripted events, and all the more exciting because of it.

The thing with pre-scripted events is that it may be fun the first time around, but if you fail the mission and have to try it again, you'll know exactly what to expect, and essentially it becomes a case of trial and error, not neccessarily skill, that wins the day.
If you have to keep trying to achieve success, it quickly becomes boring and feels contrived. Pre-scripted events do work well in some games, but honestly I think they have no place in a simulator.

As to a proper story mode, again I don't think it's neccessary. I can only speak for myself, but I'd rather play a historically accurate campaign or mission, however sometimes boring it may be, rather than one that is specifically designed to make the game more exciting or movie-like.

The problem as I see it in this sense is that sooner or later fantasy is going to creep into the game. In order to make missions ever more exciting, virtual pilots will be tasked on taking on missions that never happened or never would have happened in WW2.

I bought this sim because I wanted to experience, as close as I'll ever get, to flying a combat aircraft in WW2 and experiencing what it's like to keep tabs on manifold pressure, engaging the fuel cock, opening the rads, trimming the plane and other often mundane but important tasks. It's not all about the action but the pure experience of 'flying' these great old warbirds.

Of course the air combat plays a major role, but I want the combat to feel as authentic and realistic as possible.
Pre-scripting the action or trying to make it more movie-like is going to straddle the line between simulator and arcade game, and to me games that try and achieve both often end up achieving neither. For me, it's best to play either an arcade type game or a simulator, depending on what you're looking for.
I honestly couldn't care less about a sweeping, grandiose musical score as I attack a formation of bombers...not in a simulator. I'd be too busy adjusting the convergence of my guns to care.

You're welcome, although I haven't given that much thought to it at all, actually. I had this idea, or desire, sprung up to my mind only a day or two ago, although I did try to make my point come across as clearly as possible. Apparentaly though, I haven't done it as successfully as I wanted.

Originally Posted by smoki

Now, the slightly wacky but interesting thing I want to recommend as well, is scripted sequences in dogfighting in the "background". By this I mean, around 30% of the airplanes and dogfights in the air could be scripted to make some cool moments...

As you can see, I did say this was a wacky idea, and at the moment I couldn't find a better word (English after all, isn't my mother tongue), but I meant it more like a far-fetched, quirky idea I just wanted to add to the post, but it wasn't the main part of the idea I wanted to convey.
Also, what I want you guys to understand is that in no way I want the battle to be less of a simulator, or that the mission itself should be scripted so you know each time how it will go, so the dogfight would become boring (I mean, you can't even do that with a flight sim), but just that there should be some neat stuff added to the background on occasion (nothing cheesy), maybe once per mission. Also, I guess I was inclined to the whole scripted business because I wanted the dialogue and these kind of stuff to be done in-engine (after which you regain control of your aircraft) and not as much as a video (other than when it's neccessary such as with people on the ground, mission briefings, and the whole "get to know the pilots" business)

So, I myself understand what i want better, now. It's the story told through a live action medium not just text, preferably in-engine on starts of missions and as videos in between missions. Again, nothing cheesy. I just want to make the feel of being a pilot even stronger. I mean, yes, the manifold pressure, the cowl flaps, the engine temperature, it's all here, but the personal story of a pilot would be a nice additional touch, and something that is as equally important for the whole WWII pilot experience. That's it I guess. I mean, it's just something I'd like to see as an additional part of the game with the already great campaigns.

Edit: Just to point out, I play the game on full realism, so I don't want it to be any bit less of a simulator, just, lets "simulate" some character into it, and those friendlies and enemies.

[Phazon]

Originally Posted by Space Communist

I agree, but with the stipulation that they do the one thing RoF lacks, and that's the ability to play that dynamic campaign co-op. If that were added my friend and I would likely forget that all other games exist for years. Also we would buy every single plane/expansion if they go with that model.

Its more possible to happen with Cliffs of Dover than it is with Rise of Flight that's for sure. When you play single-player in Cliffs of Dover it uses the same code it does for multiplayer, except you are just hosting a "server" on your own PC.

[Bryan21cag]

Originally Posted by smoki

Apparently though, I haven't done it as successfully as I wanted.

lol its not your fault your post was great... There are just those on these forums that once they see one key word or phrase they do not agree with, they instantly react and lock on to what ever it is they do not like instead of responding to the actual idea that you had

For me I am kind of split on the subject.

I'm with Rattlehead on the fact that I love the true randomness of a good flight sim but at the same time I also love to be personally invested in my pilot, I.E. kill count, medals, and even an odd cut scene or two mixed in but not within the story more like what CFS did when you landed and shut down after a successful mission you got a little cut scene of you hopping down from your wing and looking back at you plane with (insert emotion here) and there was at one point plans for a really cool Bail out cut scene but I think it got dropped early in the development.

I voted in favor but maybe not exactly as you described it. I would say just a little bonus here and there like the bail out, and mission success and failure animations but without turning the actual game play into a story line driven cut scene thus removing the randomness I love so much.

My 2 bits

Cheers

[Seeker]

It's worth bearing in mind in this debate that historically Maddox games has always come down firmly on the side of scripted events.

There was an attempt at dynamic mission generation, the infamous Dgen, but it withered on the vine through lack of support; and the project developer has said numerous times he's in favour of scripted missions over dynamic as otherwise there's a risk that the wrong people could win.

Off line, I've always found the Maddox series lifeless and sterile. I've tried to get into offline flying over the years, but it never really worked for me.

And that's the biggest surprise with ROF for me: I spend at least 80% of my time offline in the wonderful dynamic career mode.

I might not agree with all the OP's points, but I think he's moving in a more fruitful direction an IL-2 stripped of most of it's features with merely a graphics boost to paper over the gaps (not counting the trees, but then again with no collision model they don't count anyway).

The Ngen generator was a simply fantastic idea, but, like Dgen, it died through lack of support.

there's rumours that ROF's career mode may be expanded to an analogue of Ngen, that's to say, a dynamicaly generated online career mode for multiplayer.

I hope it happens, I'll be one happy bunny if it does. The game play is much more important to me than the game shape, whether it's a 56RFC SE5a or a 56RAF Hurri, the game content inspires me more than the game artefact.