![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Besides, it's a trade-off. AP rounds are great for canopy and engine cowling, but awful for blowing off wings. There are other, better suited rounds for that sort of work. Last edited by CaptainDoggles; 08-15-2011 at 06:51 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a massive difference in the effectiveness of the weapons on an aircraft depending on the ammunition used. Sure pilot marksmanship accounts for something but you cannot say there is no appreciable difference between the standard rounds and specially manufactured ammunition such as the SmK H which uses tungsten carbide (not exactly a common material) and the De Wilde round which if actually available was only loaded in a single gun.
I only use SmK H rounds because its superior to the standard SmK round. I have 4 of the browning MGs loaded with De Wilde rounds because its much more effective than the standard incendiary/tracer round and I never use the standard .303 round because its pointless to use over an AP round. It would be ideal if the game had an optional ammunition limiter which stopped you from abusing special ammunition types that historically weren't common at all. At least to keep the historical lot happy. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like to fly the 109 and and use the vertical plane against Hurrys and Spitts turning fight. I often spend to much time in the fight and loose E. The fight mostly ending with me stalling out. But when I get it rite it's magic. Cutting across a turn fighters path racking his unprotected top side. I reckon a lot of pilots would get frustrated dieing that way, after all the spit is faster and turns better. Imagine yanking back on your stick expecting the hun to do the same only to find the cheeky blighter is cutting across your turn with a tonne of whack, trying a high angle shot.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think a 100% of chance to be PK in the conditions I described is anything about realisms.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If it's anything less than 500 you can take your percentages and throw them out the window. 100% chance of PK? ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Doggles,
If I show that a ceiling estimation of the chance to be Pk is 30% with absurd reasoning (I estimated that the enmy plane could each time hit the fuselage at 200m without taking into account the much larger surface of the wings) and explain that it has happen 3 time in less than an hour (this means simultaneously - I don't dye that much - in fact my death rate has skyrocketed since the introduction of the new ammo) there is something wrong. reminder : 3 time at 30% chance means that I should have 0.3x0.3x0.3 = 0.027 = 2.7% chances to get killed that way 3 time in a row ![]() Regards, TcViP Regarding the 500 times trial pls do the test with a coin toss. You'll see rapidly (at 5 to 10 try) that the chance even itself pretty rapidly around ... 50% ! Upon to you to tests it 490 times more ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't tell me that you can target the cockpit of a hurri that cross your line of sight at 200m flying 400kph right at 90°
.... or I will call you a Texan ![]() Do you see that fly atop the ridge right across the valley ? Last edited by TomcatViP; 08-17-2011 at 08:12 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|