|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
08-11-2011, 02:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 Vs Cliffs of Dover.
In spite of the release of Dover Cliffs of IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 is now currently the most 'used and played on the web.
according to my estimation Oleg Maddox has failed because the project Cliffs of Dover 'did not get the same results of IL-2 1946. Today most people play more 'in 1946 that IL-2 Sturmovik IL-2 Cliffs of Dover. IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 definitely has a wide range of aircraft of World War II can be used to 'still be expanded and improved. what are your thoughts? 
|
|
#4
08-11-2011, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a slightly different angle, IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 focuses on the aircraft used throughout the entire war, including some experimental aircraft that never got off the ground.
Cliffs of Dover on the other hand, is focused on the types used during the relatively short timeframe May - October 1940, give or take a couple of months. Hence, it only replicates the aircraft used in that timeframe, the Battle of Britain (and quite well I might add  ).Then of course there is the huge increase in computing power that is required to run the new game smoothly. Just about all they've kept from the old IL-2 is a few of the engine sounds, rather disappointingly as I was looking forward to the roar of a Rolls-Royce Merlin. Everything else - flight model, damage model, scenery, water effects - has been started from scratch and made to optimise visual enjoyment (even to the extent that they were required by law to apply the anti-epilepsy filter, which I hope has been rectified). So really, there is simply no comparison. My suggestion is, wait until the U.S. release, by then the bugs will be ironed out. Games are typically designed to succeed in the United States, otherwise they will be doomed to fail. That may be why the Russians got the worst version first, before the rest of the world came pounding on Oleg's door wanting explanations. I myself am really looking forward to this sim, even if no-one can make a Merlin sing... Tally-ho, Scott. 
|
|
#5
08-13-2011, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
First off like TT said... you need to compare CoD to IL2 1.0.. not 46.. 46 is the product of 10 years of development. To expect 46 to all of a sudden be eclipsed by CoD is at best a n aive and unrealistic idea. I laughed at all those who said things like .. "As soon as BoB is out I will be dumping IL2 .. " and "IL2 will be off my HD so fast once BoB is out....." I laugh at those bozos almost as hard as I laugh at the "vaporware" pundits... and those who think that CoD will go nowhere. Just look at IL2 to get an idea of where CoD will be going.... So you can slag it all you want.. warranted at the moment or not.. but I guarantee you.. barring a worldwide economic collapse.. (which is more frighteningly real than I care to think about for long) CoD will be the bar by which other flight sims will be measured well into this decade .... When the 20s get here I guarantee you that someone somewhere will be flying some version of IL2 3rd Generation (I still think UBI blew it big time by not calling this IL2 Storm of War:Cliffs of Dover.....and then IL2 SoW:Whatever the next theater is etc.. ) and considering that there are still those who fly CFS 1 & 2 today I wouldn't be surprised if some version of this sim wasn't being flown in 2018... after all TD is just getting warmed up..  I am looking forward to what this new series will have to offer in the next few years. Last edited by Bearcat; 08-13-2011 at 02:26 AM.
|
|
#6
08-13-2011, 08:21 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
il-2 sturmovik born 2006 whit only 36 airplane doday il-2 sturmovik 1946 have 229 list of airplane 7 years for a incomplete list of ww2 airplane from 36 to 229. much much time for ejioy a complete satisfaction. also today il-2 sturmovik 1946 missing another 150 airplane important airplane.
IL-2 clift of dover now have 14 airplane ai and another 10 airplane how many years for a complete list of ww2 airplane in cliffs of dover? now i have 35 years old we stay 2012 for next 200 airplane another 6 years in future 2018 ckiffs of dover have 230 list airplane and i have 41 years old incredible .much much time for a complete satifaction.
|
|
#7
08-13-2011, 09:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't have a computer capable of running COD, but I enjoy IL2-1946 (modded) very much. I agree with Bearcat, in time COD will develop further & IL2-1946 will probably decline in use (but not at the moment).
I wonder if releasing the SDK for COD, or at least, allowing user made mod-based enhancements as early as possible, would help "speed up" the COD game development/maturity. I guess the developers want to get the game engine & other features working properly before this happens. User contributions to the game development (mods) of IL2-1946 has seen that game reach dizzying heights with new features/game play etc. I expect that the same might occur when the users of COD are allowed to particpate in COD enhancement (mods).
|
|
#8
08-13-2011, 04:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Same year for EAW there were many 100's of planes counting mods yet IL-2 took most EAW and CFS players away. Reason IL-2 became King was not because of how many planes but how well they were modeled even though not perfect and how much better the game engine was overall. One IL-2 plane was worth many EAW planes. The IL-2 FM, DM and gunnery were so far beyond all previous sims that no amount of planes in those could make up for the new standard set -- and this was true of the IL-2 DEMO, players knew that the bar was raised even before the full game was released. CoD is the same raising of the bar except that there is trouble needing to be fixed and that is one major reason why IL-2:1946 is more played. The other is hardware needed, many players with better hardware are playing RoF and waiting for changes to CoD. If you go to a fair and they only have bumper cars then you play bumper cars. But if they add a go kart track then do you stay with the clunky bumper cars?
|
|
#9
08-14-2011, 12:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Secondly.... unless you have a crystal ball.. you don't know how much of CoD will be released when ever.. or whatever it will be like.. You can't even get your facts straight with stuff that has already happened so please .... don't try to predict the future... Thirdly... The number of planes in any sim is moot... with all the planes in IL2 I only fly about 15.. that is including what ever axis planes I fly on the rare occasion that I do... Having said that it is not the number of planes but the quality... and since as I said.. I remember when there were no Mustangs, Jugs, Lightnings,Cats,Spits,Hurris,Mossies,Zeros,Tonys,c arriers,deserts ... or a whole bunch of other stuff that is just too long a list to name.. but it is here now.. and I for one am still digging it.. I expect CoD to be in the same vein in 5-6 years.. or close... Quote:
I think they need to develop the sim more before they release an SDK.. One of the strengths of IL2, and IMO one of the reasons why it has not gone the way of so many other modded sims is that the base product is so well developed... that modding it only makes it that much better in most cases.. It still annoys me the way that so many modders act as though they made this on their own.. as if they would have been able to do this had it not been for the base product of the sim... IMO Oleg & 1C will always deserve the highest props .. for creating such a product, that even 10 years after it's initial release still has room for further development on the base engine.. and it can still make a high end rig break into a sweat a decade after the fact... Last edited by Bearcat; 08-14-2011 at 12:26 AM.
|
|
#10
08-14-2011, 04:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When the development of second BoB (nowadays CoD) started in 2007, his men had accumulated about 8 year's experience. In my opinion, the failure of BoB is mainly due to a way too big and impractical ambition. They had spent too much time on things that are not so important for a flight sim, like high-poly ground objects, controllable AAA, waving grass on the ground. They wanted to develop a ground simulation within BoB. When CoD was released, they even failed to make an improved AI system. The AI of CoD is obviously ported from IL2. The FM and DM was also problematic. Let alone the awful sound system and the much inferior GUI. They have lost their initial goal in this self-delusion. They had forgot that they were making a flight simulation game. It is just funny that they even planned to attract third-party developers from FSX with such a semi-finished product. I'm sure Oleg knew all of these very well during the later stage of development. To fulfil his ambitious goal still needs a lot of time. But due to the all-known reason, he decided to deceive us with those Friday updates and promising Q&As to cheat us into pre-purchasing this $49.99 game. Maybe he is a talented flight sim developer. But he failed to live up to the expectation that his fans have laid on him. It's sad but bloodily true. In my humble opinion, in order to achieve the similar success of FB+AEP, CoD still needs 1 year's development for the least. If it goes that far, I will consider buying the game. For now IL2 (stock) is far enough for me to ignore CoD.
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place? 
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
