Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2007, 03:13 PM
Bandit Bill Bandit Bill is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Default

I put my present gaming computer together in early Spring 2006, when it became apparent that my 4 y/o P4 2.4Ghz that had soldiered on with IL2FB was now straining under the new release IL2-1946.

The new rig was still a budget rig, with no intentions of requiring it to meet the needs of the SOW series. I expect that i'll need to replace my rig entirely a year or so after SOW:BoB is released - until then, i'll continue playing the IL2-1946 sim. I simply can't afford to, nor justify replacing my primary gaming computer until 3-4 years has passed, so i'll have to sit SOW out until then.

The present gaming rig (only used for 1946, really).

Pentium 4 - C2D E6300 - Intel 965 mobo
2 GB DC Ram
NVidia PNY 7600GS 512mb PCI-E video
Dual 19" BenQ LCD panels
X52 Hotas and pedals
Nostromo N52 gamepad
TrackIR3
Full simpit

.. and not a lick of personal flight talent to hit the broad-side of a barn with bullets or airplane after 4+ years. Go figure.

Last edited by Bandit Bill; 12-22-2007 at 03:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:13 PM
SPUDLEY1977 SPUDLEY1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 108
Default amd 3700 6800ultra oc 2g patriot

Great idea, here’s my homegrown specs:
Windoze xp sp2 home
Viewsonic vx922

2.04m IL-2
OPEN GL
1280X960X32
ATTEMPT STENCIL BUFER

VIS DISTANCE – HI
OBJECT LIGHTING – MED
OBJECT DETAIL – EXCELLENT
LANDSCAPE LIGHTING – HI
LANDSCAPE DETAIL – EXCELLENT
CLOUDS DETAIL – MED

CONFIG.INI LOCKED WITH
WATER =0

NVIDIA NFORCEWARE DRIVERS VER 6.14.11.6921 12-5-07

THE BLACK DEATH
10 SEC 40 FPS
20 SEC 55 FPS
1.07 SEC 15 FPS (*)

(*) This is the lowest point, at the time of explosion you can see the fps really drop to a crawl approx 1 min 7 seconds.

Vid Card settings are application controlled with VSYNC forced OFF. Things look pretty good all around. At perfect settings the visual quality is not noticeably better but FPS definitely drop. So this is how I run, I don’t seem to lose visuals but the FPS are more playable – smoother.
Prior drivers were 6.6.9.3 and 7.1.77, I think my FPS @ 1.07 might have been 17-18 with the 6.6.9.3 drivers. I may revert.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2007, 07:06 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

IBM PC XT
processor 8088 @ 4.77 MHz
8087 math coprocessor
256 kB RAM
20 MB Hard Disc
Floppy Drive 5.25", 360 kB
MDA Video Card
Green phosphors monitor
PC-DOS



Any chances?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2007, 07:29 PM
Viking's Avatar
Viking Viking is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 456
Default

So what will the optimal system be in a year when BoB is released only taking in to account what we know today?

Opsys = 64 bit

CPU = 3 or 4 core 64 bit

GPU = eg G92 ,1G DDR, OGL 3, displayport

RAM = 4G ddr3

MB = PCIe 3.0, DX 10.1 sound, legacy free

HD = SSD, SATA 3

Screen = displayport, 1080p

Just rambling what I can recall reading on the net. Anything else or any corrections.

BTW if I will be able to run SoW BoB on my present computer I doubt that I will by it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2007, 07:51 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

Intel 6850 @3 gigs
Corsair DDR2-1066 4 gigs
Nvidia 7900GTX waiting for BOB to upgrade to a next generation video card

I've overclocked the cpu from @ 3.2 , 3.6, 3.8, and 4 gigs. I was getting huge frame rates in the black death track. At one point during a 4 gig test my system crashed and I restored the BIO defaults. Since then when I overclock the cpu and test with the Black Death track my frame rates actually fall. Cpu Z shows the proper overclock, and all the cpu heat tests I run show that the cpu isn't over heating. The only thing that I found different is the Windows task manager shows IL-2 using only 50% of the cpu and I thought IL-2 used almost 100%. I have the Speedstep disabled in the BIO's and the cpu doesn't seem to be downclocking when running a intensive app. I'm at a loss. It don't need the speed now but would like to overclock again when BOB comes out.

~Salute~
Chivas
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2007, 08:50 PM
fireflyerz fireflyerz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: All over the world...
Posts: 417
Default

No eye deer , my brother built it.......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-27-2007, 01:19 PM
archer11 archer11 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austria
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insuber View Post
IBM PC XT
processor 8088 @ 4.77 MHz
8087 math coprocessor
256 kB RAM
20 MB Hard Disc
Floppy Drive 5.25", 360 kB
MDA Video Card
Green phosphors monitor
PC-DOS

Any chances?
Your RAM is overmodelled.



My rig 's getting really old now, although 4.08 is running pretty fine (not on perfect though )...
P4 2.8GHz
2GB RAM
ATI X800GT 256MB
TIR 3 Pro
MSSW FFB 2
CH-throttle
CH-pedals

Guess I'll buy BoB on release-day and wait for decent reviews about system-specs to build a new one afterwards.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2007, 10:01 AM
Tallyho1961 Tallyho1961 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2
Default

Here's the system:

HEC 435W PSU | ASRock 939Dual SATA2 | AMD64 3700+ | 2G PC3200 DDR RAM
ASUS X1950PRO 256MB | Audigy 2 | Saitek X45 | CH Pro Pedals | Track IR3 Pro

Running at 1024 x 768 x 32
Perfect landscape
Water 0

Kamikaze yields an average FPS of 54, minimum 20, maximum 137

Last edited by Tallyho1961; 12-29-2007 at 10:02 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2007, 04:47 PM
SPUDLEY1977 SPUDLEY1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 108
Default Talleyho....

Our systems are very similiar. If you run it with only one stick (1g) ram, how does it compare to two G?

I know the DDR throughput will be slightly diminished but I was curious the diff between a pair of .5G sticks totalling 1G versus a pair of 1.0G sticks with total of 2G ram.

Loading diff?
Rejoin lag pause?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2007, 11:37 PM
Tallyho1961 Tallyho1961 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2
Default

Spudley:

It's been a while since I added the second stick - probably two years - but as best I can recall the most obvious improvement versus 1G was game load time. Come to think of it, the RAM doubling was part of a major new MoBo upgrade so I can't actually isolate the impact.

I know that's not much help, but it's the best I can do.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.