Performance comparison initiative

[lothar29]

I think it would be interesting to say about stuttering, as to my going with some more or less decent FPS but I have a horrible stuttering in Earth...impossible to fly...

CPU- I7 950 @3.6GHz
Mother- ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
RAM- Corsair Vengance3x2Gb/1600MHz/9-9-9-24
GPU- 2xGTX 470 @608/GDDR5 1280Mb/275.33---- The second GPU this would give me very bad performance with the CoD
OS- Windows 7 Home premium x64
PSU-Nox Apex 800W modular



High settings
Min:15 fps
Max:60 fps
Avg:29 fps


The configuration, commissioning the maximum less effects in half and trees is low, and ORIGINAL...

Then I would put a picture of the NVIDIA control panel

[yellonet]

Originally Posted by lothar29

I think it would be interesting to say about stuttering, as to my going with some more or less decent FPS but I have a horrible stuttering in Earth...impossible to fly...

Yes of course it's encourouged that people testing give their impressions, micro stutters are hard to measure so that would have to be written as example "sometimes a few micro stutters" or "heavy microstutters at all times". The more information one can give about the performance, the better.

But what we have to start with is to agree on the formal measurable tests so that everyone tests at the same three settings.

[FFCW_Urizen]

for res, i would suggest a resolution every monitor is able to display, my tft only goes up to 1680x1050 for example, so i´d suggest a max resolution of 1440x900 or even just 1280x1024 (which every tft should be able to handle).

For Comparison reasons we should use the presets shipping with CloD, VSync off, AEF off, SSAO on/off.

[yellonet]

Originally Posted by FFCW_Urizen

for res, i would suggest a resolution every monitor is able to display, my tft only goes up to 1680x1050 for example, so i´d suggest a max resolution of 1440x900 or even just 1280x1024 (which every tft should be able to handle).

For Comparison reasons we should use the presets shipping with CloD, VSync off, AEF off, SSAO on/off.

It would be ideal to use a low resolution that everyone could set, but then we wouldn't get very meaningful results as people tend to want to play especially simulations at high resolution. As you drop the resolution, the CPU becomes more and more important and the GPU less important for high FPS.
Perhaps if it is not too much to ask people with high resolution monitors could run the tests at lower resolution too.
I have a 24" screen with 1920x1200, I could make the tests in that resolution and several lower resolutions as well.


Edit: Anyway, we need more opinions so that we can have as wide an agreement as possible.

[FFCW_Urizen]

then we should go with your first suggestion of resolution and related detailsettings.

So Long
Uri

[yellonet]

Fraps results... what am I doing wrong?

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
15, 60000, 0, 14, 0.250

[yellonet]

I take it that no one is interested in this?