Compare with "this" with this

[cre8tive Delay]

starting an Rof thread here is like starting a ManU Thread on a ManCity Forum.

I can only say: I bought ROF 2 Month after release and it was a bit of a mess. But in no way it was in a condition like CLOD is. I don't know why people here keep saying this. oh wait ... yes: this is a City forum.

Get over it people. Someone else did a better Job with another sim. IL2 is not untouchable and has to compete other sims nowadays. That said: competition is good for us simmers and the market.

Edit: oh one more thing. Q6600 @2,4 GHz Oced to 3,2. GF: 460 Gt 4 GB of Ram. ROF nearly maxed out at 1920 x 1200 4x Anti Aliasing. View Range (of forests and objects) set to medium (tht's like max before 1.019). Saying that CLOD could come anywhere near this eyecandy with a system like mine or ROF wouldn't be able to look TOP on a system like mine, is either ignoring the truth or pure and simple frustrated rof bashing. TRUTH & FACT

[Thee_oddball]

Originally Posted by Baron

It has been explained why the I-16 is there. The hangar is suppose to look like a Aviation museum and RoF is of course the WWI section. The I-16 stands in the WWII section.

Has nothing to do with 777 implying a WWII sim is on the way.


And yes, the vid looks cool but it doesnt looke even close to that on my pc, and i have an up to date one. Personally i find alot of the textures, especially in the cockpit to be quite "poor" or "bland".

Not slagging RoF but they are 2 different eras etc, etc, etc.

thnx for the FYI i just got rof a few weeks ago and thought it was funny to see an I16 in the showroom.

compareing CLOD to ROF is like comparing a king tiger to a sherman...one is massive and powerful but keeps breaking down and the other is half the size and strength but runs real well

S!