Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:43 PM
Orpheus Orpheus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
As I said be quiet..

Again you obviously don't know what your talking about and have basically said the same thing again so il follow you...

Win7 gimmick benchmarking system will cause more issues than fixing them due to the way it diagnoses your hardware and gives priorities to certain combinations which have no real world meaning..

So please listen to what I said the first time, insult me all you like and if you think I'm whining well then...fair play I don't know what else to say.

Now run along and don't bother me again

I give up - there's no reasoning with chumps. All the OP was trying to do was be helpful, if you wanna puke all over that go right ahead.

Last edited by Orpheus; 07-01-2011 at 10:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:49 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orpheus View Post
I give up - there's no reasoning with chumps. All the OP was trying to do was be helpful, if you wanna puke all over that go right ahead.
You still here?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:54 PM
Orpheus Orpheus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
You still here?
Apparently so. So far I'm the only person that's actually contributed to the thread instead of whining because you all prefer a different benchmark.

Thought of trying that? You know, contributing? No, of course not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:04 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orpheus View Post
Apparently so. So far I'm the only person that's actually contributed to the thread instead of whining because you all prefer a different benchmark.

Thought of trying that? You know, contributing? No, of course not.
Ok numbnuts il be clear here...I gave my input saying the win7 benchmark tool is flawed so DON'T use it due to it causing a lot of BS from people that already have issues...you gave no input other than to come in here "puking" as you say all over my post...where was you input at that point?

If you bother to look I've added input you on the otherhand are in here bashing me...

Please stop wasting your time
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:07 PM
zoopyzook zoopyzook is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Ok numbnuts il be clear here...I gave my input saying the win7 benchmark tool is flawed so DON'T use it due to it causing a lot of BS from people that already have issues...you gave no input other than to come in here "puking" as you say all over my post...where was you input at that point?

If you bother to look I've added input you on the otherhand are in here bashing me...

Please stop wasting your time

I have to agree, win7 experience gives me a 7.6 on a 2 year old machine (apart from my GPU) so it can't be that accurate.

will follow with my 3DMark11 score when it finishes downloading
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:25 PM
Thee_oddball Thee_oddball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopyzook View Post
I have to agree, win7 experience gives me a 7.6 on a 2 year old machine (apart from my GPU) so it can't be that accurate.

will follow with my 3DMark11 score when it finishes downloading
you have a much better rig than i do and i get
6.9 cpu
7.4 mem
7.5 vid

Im happy with the score and performance but i wonder how it is rating my system.

S!
__________________
Gigabyte Z68
Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler
8GB Ram
EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram
CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W
64 GB SSD SATA II HD
WIN7 UL 64BIT
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:11 PM
Orpheus Orpheus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Ok numbnuts il be clear here...I gave my input saying the win7 benchmark tool is flawed so DON'T use it due to it causing a lot of BS from people that already have issues...you gave no input other than to come in here "puking" as you say all over my post...where was you input at that point?

If you bother to look I've added input you on the otherhand are in here bashing me...

Please stop wasting your time
Acutally I seem to remember you telling me to 'be quiet' as if I were some 8 year old with his hand in the cookie jar when all I asked was that people contribute to the benchmark idea, even if they disagree as to whether it's 'worth it' or not - because frankly neither of us know which benchmark would be more use to the developers. Since you felt it necessary to talk to me like a child, I have no problem returning the favour.

Since a forum moderator has asked for this I thought it was worth adding my results instead of complaining about his choice of benchmark - which is all you and everyone else in this thread has done. I don't consider that a 'contribution'. I'm done arguing this point with you, so just let it go and let the thread go back to being useful for those people who actually want to help instead of complain.


Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopyzook View Post
I have to agree, win7 experience gives me a 7.6 on a 2 year old machine (apart from my GPU) so it can't be that accurate.

will follow with my 3DMark11 score when it finishes downloading
Looking at your specs, you're running a pretty hefty rig, regardless of whether it's two years old or not. Seems pretty accurate to me.

Last edited by Orpheus; 07-01-2011 at 11:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.