![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heinkill now did a review on his bobgamehub blog.
review here http://www.freewebs.com/heinkill/cli...overreview.htm or PDF http://www.box.net/shared/ndc29azgxqm060gqzeal i think he undervalues online game which has now been fixed with beta patch. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probably the best review of Clod I've yet read. Very balanced and fair.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great review and very honest!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the ending. "Patience will be rewarded" Good review.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great review!
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() ~S~ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think is harsh on mp and soft on sp, but some good lines...
' Where BOBII creates the impression the player is flying against an almost human (and not superhuman) opponent, Cliffs of Dover makes the player feel he is playing against a monkey.' Why i have always preferred online because no ai pilot can match human. Good one! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Different people have different ideas about gameplay. HeinKill and I share an interest in historical campaigns - simply for the fact that only they can manage to recreate the atmosphere of the real operation (within the constraints of the engine). Online, on the other hand, will never be that "realistic" since realism and people having fun don't go along well. Most are not interested in the details that make or break a campaign for me and I am not interested in the never-ending dogfights which many players consider the heart of a flight sim while I try to look at the bigger picture and try to put the aerial ops into a framework which allows me to see their role as it really was.
So IMO the review is spot on, although I disagree on the german campaign which I also consider a bad joke. But that's just me. ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|